| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:16:13 +0800
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, syzbot
<syzbot+50ef73537bbc393a25bb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
<syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in __folio_rmap_sanity_checks
On 1/3/2024 8:13 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.01.24 12:48, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>
>> HEAD commit: ab0b3e6ef50d Add linux-next specific files for 20240102
>> git tree: linux-next
>> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17be3e09e80000
>> kernel config:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a14a6350374945f9
>> dashboard link:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=50ef73537bbc393a25bb
>> compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils
>> for Debian) 2.40
>> syz repro:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14e2256ee80000
>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17b57db5e80000
>>
>> Downloadable assets:
>> disk image:
>> https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4e6376fe5764/disk-ab0b3e6e.raw.xz
>> vmlinux:
>> https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7cb9ecbaf001/vmlinux-ab0b3e6e.xz
>> kernel image:
>> https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2c1a9a6d424f/bzImage-ab0b3e6e.xz
>>
>> The issue was bisected to:
>>
>> commit 68f0320824fa59c5429cbc811e6c46e7a30ea32c
>> Author: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Date: Wed Dec 20 22:44:31 2023 +0000
>>
>> mm/rmap: convert folio_add_file_rmap_range() into
>> folio_add_file_rmap_[pte|ptes|pmd]()
>>
>> bisection log:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=10b9e1b1e80000
>> final oops:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=12b9e1b1e80000
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14b9e1b1e80000
>>
>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the
>> commit:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+50ef73537bbc393a25bb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Fixes: 68f0320824fa ("mm/rmap: convert folio_add_file_rmap_range()
>> into folio_add_file_rmap_[pte|ptes|pmd]()")
>>
>> kasan_quarantine_reduce+0x18e/0x1d0 mm/kasan/quarantine.c:283
>> __kasan_slab_alloc+0x65/0x90 mm/kasan/common.c:324
>> kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]
>> slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]
>> slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]
>> kmem_cache_alloc+0x136/0x320 mm/slub.c:3867
>> vm_area_alloc+0x1f/0x220 kernel/fork.c:465
>> mmap_region+0x3ae/0x2a90 mm/mmap.c:2804
>> do_mmap+0x890/0xef0 mm/mmap.c:1379
>> vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1a7/0x3c0 mm/util.c:573
>> ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x421/0x5a0 mm/mmap.c:1425
>> __do_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:93 [inline]
>> __se_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:86 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_mmap+0x125/0x190 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:86
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5059 at include/linux/rmap.h:202
>> __folio_rmap_sanity_checks+0x4d5/0x630 include/linux/rmap.h:202
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 1 PID: 5059 Comm: syz-executor115 Not tainted
>> 6.7.0-rc8-next-20240102-syzkaller #0
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine,
>> BIOS Google 11/17/2023
>> RIP: 0010:__folio_rmap_sanity_checks+0x4d5/0x630 include/linux/rmap.h:202
>> Code: 41 83 e4 01 44 89 e6 e8 79 bc b7 ff 45 84 e4 0f 85 08 fc ff ff
>> e8 3b c1 b7 ff 48 c7 c6 e0 b5 d9 8a 48 89 df e8 5c 12 f7 ff 90 <0f> 0b
>> 90 e9 eb fb ff ff e8 1e c1 b7 ff be 01 00 00 00 48 89 df e8
>> RSP: 0018:ffffc900038df978 EFLAGS: 00010293
>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00008cde00 RCX: ffffffff81687419
>> RDX: ffff88807becbb80 RSI: ffffffff81d06104 RDI: 0000000000000000
>> RBP: ffffea00008cde00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff1e75f6a
>> R10: ffffffff8f3afb57 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
>> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
>> FS: 0000555556508380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00000000200000c0 CR3: 0000000079000000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> __folio_add_rmap mm/rmap.c:1167 [inline]
>> __folio_add_file_rmap mm/rmap.c:1452 [inline]
>> folio_add_file_rmap_ptes+0x8e/0x2c0 mm/rmap.c:1478
>> insert_page_into_pte_locked.isra.0+0x34d/0x960 mm/memory.c:1874
>> insert_page mm/memory.c:1900 [inline]
>> vm_insert_page+0x62c/0x8c0 mm/memory.c:2053
>> packet_mmap+0x314/0x570 net/packet/af_packet.c:4594
>> call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2090 [inline]
>> mmap_region+0x745/0x2a90 mm/mmap.c:2819
>> do_mmap+0x890/0xef0 mm/mmap.c:1379
>> vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1a7/0x3c0 mm/util.c:573
>> ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x421/0x5a0 mm/mmap.c:1425
>> __do_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:93 [inline]
>> __se_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:86 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_mmap+0x125/0x190 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:86
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a
>
> If I am not wrong, that triggers:
>
> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) &&
> !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio), folio);
>
> So we are trying to rmap a large folio that did not go through
> folio_prep_large_rmappable().
>
> net/packet/af_packet.c calls vm_insert_page() on some pages/folios stoed
> in the "struct packet_ring_buffer". No idea where that comes from, but I
> suspect it's simply some compound allocation.
Looks like:
alloc_pg_vec
alloc_one_pg_vec_page
gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_COMP |
__GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY;
buffer = (char *) __get_free_pages(gfp_flags, order);
So you are right here... :).
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
>
> Likely, rmap handling is completely bogus for these folios?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists