lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPY8ntCdsvLvFm1fezQamKibbcsQoOCNc2nBsvj6vhLH3s0udw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:14:46 +0000
From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, 
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, 
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, 
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>, 
	Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>, Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek+publicgit@...il.com>, 
	nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, 
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/25] drm/modes: Move named modes parsing to a
 separate function

On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 14:02, Dave Stevenson
<dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxime
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 13:33, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Happy new year :)
>
> And to you.
>
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:12:26PM +0000, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime
> > >
> > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 13:00, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The current construction of the named mode parsing doesn't allow to extend
> > > > it easily. Let's move it to a separate function so we can add more
> > > > parameters and modes.
> > > >
> > > > In order for the tests to still pass, some extra checks are needed, so
> > > > it's not a 1:1 move.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek+publicgit@...il.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v7:
> > > > - Add Noralf Reviewed-by
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v6:
> > > > - Simplify the test for connection status extras
> > > > - Simplify the code path to call drm_mode_parse_cmdline_named_mode
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - Fold down all the named mode patches that were split into a single
> > > >   patch again to maintain bisectability
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > index 71c050c3ee6b..37542612912b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > @@ -2229,6 +2229,51 @@ static const char * const drm_named_modes_whitelist[] = {
> > > >         "PAL",
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > +static int drm_mode_parse_cmdline_named_mode(const char *name,
> > > > +                                            unsigned int name_end,
> > > > +                                            struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmdline_mode)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       unsigned int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (!name_end)
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* If the name starts with a digit, it's not a named mode */
> > > > +       if (isdigit(name[0]))
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /*
> > > > +        * If there's an equal sign in the name, the command-line
> > > > +        * contains only an option and no mode.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (strnchr(name, name_end, '='))
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* The connection status extras can be set without a mode. */
> > > > +       if (name_end == 1 &&
> > > > +           (name[0] == 'd' || name[0] == 'D' || name[0] == 'e'))
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /*
> > > > +        * We're sure we're a named mode at this point, iterate over the
> > > > +        * list of modes we're aware of.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(drm_named_modes_whitelist); i++) {
> > > > +               int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +               ret = str_has_prefix(name, drm_named_modes_whitelist[i]);
> > > > +               if (ret != name_end)
> > > > +                       continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +               strcpy(cmdline_mode->name, drm_named_modes_whitelist[i]);
> > > > +               cmdline_mode->specified = true;
> > > > +
> > > > +               return 1;
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > > +       return -EINVAL;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  /**
> > > >   * drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector - parse command line modeline for connector
> > > >   * @mode_option: optional per connector mode option
> > > > @@ -2265,7 +2310,7 @@ bool drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(const char *mode_option,
> > > >         const char *bpp_ptr = NULL, *refresh_ptr = NULL, *extra_ptr = NULL;
> > > >         const char *options_ptr = NULL;
> > > >         char *bpp_end_ptr = NULL, *refresh_end_ptr = NULL;
> > > > -       int i, len, ret;
> > > > +       int len, ret;
> > > >
> > > >         memset(mode, 0, sizeof(*mode));
> > > >         mode->panel_orientation = DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_UNKNOWN;
> > > > @@ -2306,18 +2351,19 @@ bool drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(const char *mode_option,
> > > >                 parse_extras = true;
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > > -       /* First check for a named mode */
> > > > -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(drm_named_modes_whitelist); i++) {
> > > > -               ret = str_has_prefix(name, drm_named_modes_whitelist[i]);
> > > > -               if (ret == mode_end) {
> > > > -                       if (refresh_ptr)
> > > > -                               return false; /* named + refresh is invalid */
> > > > +       if (!mode_end)
> > > > +               return false;
> > >
> > > I'm chasing down a change in behaviour between 6.1 and 6.6, and this
> > > patch seems to be at least part of the cause.
> > >
> > > Since [1] we've had the emulated framebuffer on Pi being 16bpp to save
> > > memory. All good.
> > >
> > > It used to be possible to use "video=HDMI-A-1:-32" on the kernel
> > > command line to set it back to 32bpp.
> > >
> > > After this patch that is no longer possible. "mode_end = bpp_off", and
> > > "bpp_off = bpp_ptr - name", so with bpp_ptr = name we get mode_end
> > > being 0. That fails this conditional.
> > > drm_mode_parse_cmdline_named_mode already aborts early but with no
> > > error if name_end / mode_end is 0, so this "if" clause seems
> > > redundant, and is a change in behaviour.
> > >
> > > We do then get a second parsing failure due to the check if (bpp_ptr
> > > || refresh_ptr) at [2].
> > > Prior to this patch my video= line would get mode->specified set via
> > > "if (ret == mode_end)" removed above, as ret = mode_end = 0. We
> > > therefore didn't evaluate the conditional that now fails.
> > >
> > > So I guess my question is whether my command line is valid or not, and
> > > therefore is this a regression?
> >
> > It's a mess :)
> >
> > Documentation/fb/modedb.rst defines the video parameter syntax as:
> >
> > <xres>x<yres>[M][R][-<bpp>][@<refresh>][i][m][eDd]
> >
> > And thus mandates the x and y resolution. I guess that's what I use as a
> > base, and thus -bpp alone would be invalid.
> >
> > But then it contradicts itself some time later by documenting that
> > video=HDMI-1:D is ok.
> >
> > I guess what you experienced was just an oversight: it was not
> > documented anywhere that it was valid, so we didn't really tested it
> > either. We should add a unit test for it and fix it.
>
> Does dropping this "if (!mode_end)" check, and at least the check for
> bpp_ptr in the "No mode?" block below it, seem reasonable to you?
>
> I guess there is also the question of whether a refresh rate without a
> mode is valid. That one seems less useful, and all uses of
> refresh_specified appear to be after some form of checking xres and
> yres.
>
> I can put a couple of patches together to deal with this if you're
> happy with the principle.

In looking at this in more detail and writing the unit test, it does
become a bit of a mess.

drm_connector_get_cmdline_mode calls
drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector, passing in
connector->cmdline_mode as the mode to fill.
drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector fills in bits of the mode as
it goes along, so a failure late in the function leaves bits from the
parsing in connector->cmdline_mode.

My video=HDMI-A-1:-32 does fail later on due to
drm_mode_parse_cmdline_options, but as it had set bpp and
bpp_specified directly in connector->cmdline_mode I got the behaviour
I was desiring.

It feels like this should be an all or nothing thing. Allocate a
struct drm_cmdline_mode on the stack, and only copy it into
connector->cmdline_mode if parsing succeeds. The downside is that you
take out some command line entries that used to work (like mine).
Thoughts?

  Dave

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ