linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: property: One function call less in drm_property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd300771-851f-4cfb-b9a2-d87d2b4399aa@mailbox.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:18:13 +0100
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: property: One function call less in
 drm_property_create() after error detection

On 2024-01-03 17:24, Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
>> Out of curiosity, what exactly did Coccinelle report?
> 
> Some SmPL scripts from my own selection tend to point questionable implementation details out.

That doesn't answer my question.

Without seeing the actual Coccinelle report, I'll assume that it didn't actually call for this change.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast          |         Mesa and Xwayland developer