[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZW5Y85OdibCu58h@LeoBras>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:45:39 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com,
panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn,
bjorn@...osinc.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
keescook@...omium.org,
wuwei2016@...as.ac.cn,
xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com,
chao.wei@...hgo.com,
unicorn_wang@...look.com,
uwu@...nowy.me,
jszhang@...nel.org,
wefu@...hat.com,
atishp@...shpatra.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] riscv: xchg: Prefetch the destination word for sc.w
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:15:45PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:19 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 03:29:53AM -0500, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > >
> > > The cost of changing a cacheline from shared to exclusive state can be
> > > significant, especially when this is triggered by an exclusive store,
> > > since it may result in having to retry the transaction.
> > >
> > > This patch makes use of prefetch.w to prefetch cachelines for write
> > > prior to lr/sc loops when using the xchg_small atomic routine.
> > >
> > > This patch is inspired by commit: 0ea366f5e1b6 ("arm64: atomics:
> > > prefetch the destination word for write prior to stxr").
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > index 26cea2395aae..d7b9d7951f08 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <asm/barrier.h>
> > > #include <asm/fence.h>
> > > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > >
> > > #define __arch_xchg_masked(prepend, append, r, p, n) \
> >
> > Are you sure this is based on v6.7-rc7? Because I don't see this macro.
> Oh, it is based on Leobras' patches. I would remove it in the next of version.
I would say this next :)
>
> >
> > > ({ \
> > > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
> > > \
> > > __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
> > > prepend \
> > > + PREFETCHW_ASM(%5) \
> > > "0: lr.w %0, %2\n" \
> > > " and %1, %0, %z4\n" \
> > > " or %1, %1, %z3\n" \
> > > @@ -30,7 +32,7 @@
> > > " bnez %1, 0b\n" \
> > > append \
> > > : "=&r" (__retx), "=&r" (__rc), "+A" (*(__ptr32b)) \
> > > - : "rJ" (__newx), "rJ" (~__mask) \
> > > + : "rJ" (__newx), "rJ" (~__mask), "rJ" (__ptr32b) \
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we don't want to allow the J constraint for __ptr32b.
> >
> > > : "memory"); \
> > > \
> > > r = (__typeof__(*(p)))((__retx & __mask) >> __s); \
> > > --
> > > 2.40.1
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guo Ren
>
Nice patch :)
Any reason it's not needed in __arch_cmpxchg_masked(), and __arch_cmpxchg() ?
Thanks!
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists