linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] min_heap: Min heap optimizations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZZW+zcfFOa5YgK2j@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:08:45 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] min_heap: Min heap optimizations

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:56:29AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:32 AM Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The purpose of this patch series is to enhance the existing min heap
> > implementation. The optimization focuses on both the heap construction
> > process and the number of comparisons made during the heapify
> > operation.
> >
> > Kuan-Wei Chiu (2):
> >   min_heap: Optimize number of calls to min_heapify()
> >   min_heap: Optimize number of comparisons in min_heapify()
> 
> Thanks Kuan-Wei,
> 
> The patch series looks good to me. Given the extra conditions should
> there be some updates to:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/test_min_heap.c
> to ensure coverage?
>
Hi Ian,

Thank you for your review.

The current min_heap test is sufficient to cover all the code changes
introduced by this patch series, even when only tested with a known
set of values copied from the data.

Additionally, I'm unsure if the commit message title prefix I used is
correct. Perhaps I should use "lib:" instead of "min_heap:"?

Best regards,
Kuan-Wei Chiu