[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e3455a1-c540-4323-9d9d-95289a395c3f@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:19:18 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: add MT7988 LVTS reset
ID
On 04/01/2024 19:12, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:39:29PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>>
>> ---
>> include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt7988-resets.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt7988-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt7988-resets.h
>> index 493301971367..3f1e4ec07ad5 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt7988-resets.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt7988-resets.h
>> @@ -10,4 +10,8 @@
>> /* ETHWARP resets */
>> #define MT7988_ETHWARP_RST_SWITCH 0
>>
>> +/* INFRA resets */
>> +#define MT7988_INFRA_RST0_THERM_CTRL_SWRST 9
>
> I suppose this argument applies here as well:
>
> "IDs should start from 0 or 1 and increment by 1. If these are not IDs,
> then you do not need them in the bindings."
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/59629ec1-cc0c-4c5a-87cc-ea30d64ec191@linaro.org/
>
> As a consequence, as what you are describing there are hardware bits
If this is existing driver which already uses such pattern, then it is
fine. I usually comment this on new drivers which can be changed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists