[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZcIthn20O1l1DDL@ghost>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:36:22 -0800
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] riscv: Convert relocation iterator to do-while
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:35:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 12:22:03PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > Use a do-while loop to iterate through relocation entries to prevent
> > curr_type from being marked as uninitialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > Fixes: d8792a5734b0 ("riscv: Safely remove entries from relocation list")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202312130859.wnkuzVWY-lkp@intel.com/
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> > index ceb0adb38715..581e425686ab 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -633,15 +633,31 @@ process_accumulated_relocations(struct module *me,
> > bucket_iter->bucket, node) {
> > buffer = 0;
> > location = rel_head_iter->location;
> > - list_for_each_entry_safe(rel_entry_iter,
> > - rel_entry_iter_tmp,
> > - rel_head_iter->rel_entry,
> > - head) {
> > + rel_entry_iter =
> > + list_first_entry(rel_head_iter->rel_entry,
> > + typeof(*rel_entry_iter), head);
> > + rel_entry_iter_tmp =
> > + list_next_entry(rel_entry_iter, head);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Iterate through all relocation entries that share
> > + * this location. This uses a do-while loop instead of
> > + * list_for_each_entry_safe since it is known that there
> > + * is at least one entry and curr_type needs to be the
> > + * value of the last entry when the loop exits.
> > + */
>
> I know that I reported this static checker and all, but actually after
> reading this comment, I think we should stay with original code. So
> long as we know the list has "least one entry" which we do then the
> original code worked fine.
>
> To be honest, I probably would not have even reported this static
> checker warning except that I saw there were some other issues and
> thought "Eh, why not throw this warning in as well, in case the list
> can be empty."
That makes sense, I will drop that patch.
- Charlie
>
> The other three patches look good.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists