[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZcuwkBsvSs6bzXF@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:18:42 -0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tiago Lam <tiagolam@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] rust: sync: add `CondVar::wait_timeout`
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:02:43PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Sleep on a condition variable with a timeout.
>
> This is used by Rust Binder for process freezing. There, we want to
> sleep until the freeze operation completes, but we want to be able to
> abort the process freezing if it doesn't complete within some timeout.
>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tiago Lam <tiagolam@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
That said, I want to hear from Thomas on the usage of jiffies, see
below:
> ---
[...]
> - fn wait_internal<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(&self, wait_state: u32, guard: &mut Guard<'_, T, B>) {
> + fn wait_internal<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(
> + &self,
> + wait_state: u32,
> + guard: &mut Guard<'_, T, B>,
> + timeout_in_jiffies: c_long,
This is an internal function, and it makes sense we use the same type
for durations as the C function we rely on.
> + ) -> c_long {
> let wait = Opaque::<bindings::wait_queue_entry>::uninit();
>
> // SAFETY: `wait` points to valid memory.
> @@ -113,11 +122,13 @@ fn wait_internal<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(&self, wait_state: u32, guard: &mut Guar
> bindings::prepare_to_wait_exclusive(self.wait_list.get(), wait.get(), wait_state as _)
> };
>
> - // SAFETY: No arguments, switches to another thread.
> - guard.do_unlocked(|| unsafe { bindings::schedule() });
> + // SAFETY: Switches to another thread. The timeout can be any number.
> + let ret = guard.do_unlocked(|| unsafe { bindings::schedule_timeout(timeout_in_jiffies) });
>
> // SAFETY: Both `wait` and `wait_list` point to valid memory.
> unsafe { bindings::finish_wait(self.wait_list.get(), wait.get()) };
> +
> + ret
> }
>
[...]
> + /// Releases the lock and waits for a notification in interruptible mode.
> + ///
> + /// Atomically releases the given lock (whose ownership is proven by the guard) and puts the
> + /// thread to sleep. It wakes up when notified by [`CondVar::notify_one`] or
> + /// [`CondVar::notify_all`], or when a timeout occurs, or when the thread receives a signal.
> + #[must_use = "wait_interruptible_timeout returns if a signal is pending, so the caller must check the return value"]
> + pub fn wait_interruptible_timeout<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(
> + &self,
> + guard: &mut Guard<'_, T, B>,
> + jiffies: Jiffies,
This is a public interface, so it may make sense use a HZ-independent
type for durations, e.g. core::time::Duration:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/time/struct.Duration.html
but we don't have enough users to see whether there would be a need for
HZ-dependent durations, so I think it's fine that we stick with a simple
solution in Alice's patchset to get the ball rolling, we can always
remove a public interface with HZ-dependent durations whenever we want.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Boqun
> + ) -> CondVarTimeoutResult {
> + let jiffies = jiffies.try_into().unwrap_or(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + let res = self.wait_internal(bindings::TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, guard, jiffies);
> +
> + match (res as Jiffies, crate::current!().signal_pending()) {
> + (jiffies, true) => CondVarTimeoutResult::Signal { jiffies },
> + (0, false) => CondVarTimeoutResult::Timeout,
> + (jiffies, false) => CondVarTimeoutResult::Woken { jiffies },
> + }
> + }
> +
[...]
> +
> +/// The return type of `wait_timeout`.
> +pub enum CondVarTimeoutResult {
> + /// The timeout was reached.
> + Timeout,
> + /// Somebody woke us up.
> + Woken {
> + /// Remaining sleep duration.
> + jiffies: Jiffies,
> + },
> + /// A signal occurred.
> + Signal {
> + /// Remaining sleep duration.
> + jiffies: Jiffies,
> + },
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> index f12a684bc957..149a5259d431 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ pub struct Guard<'a, T: ?Sized, B: Backend> {
> unsafe impl<T: Sync + ?Sized, B: Backend> Sync for Guard<'_, T, B> {}
>
> impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> Guard<'_, T, B> {
> - pub(crate) fn do_unlocked(&mut self, cb: impl FnOnce()) {
> + pub(crate) fn do_unlocked<U>(&mut self, cb: impl FnOnce() -> U) -> U {
> // SAFETY: The caller owns the lock, so it is safe to unlock it.
> unsafe { B::unlock(self.lock.state.get(), &self.state) };
>
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ pub(crate) fn do_unlocked(&mut self, cb: impl FnOnce()) {
> let _relock =
> ScopeGuard::new(|| unsafe { B::relock(self.lock.state.get(), &mut self.state) });
>
> - cb();
> + cb()
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/task.rs b/rust/kernel/task.rs
> index 9451932d5d86..ffb4a51eb898 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/task.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/task.rs
> @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
> use crate::{bindings, types::Opaque};
> use core::{marker::PhantomData, ops::Deref, ptr};
>
> +/// A sentinal value used for infinite timeouts.
> +pub const MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT: c_long = c_long::MAX;
> +
> /// Returns the currently running task.
> #[macro_export]
> macro_rules! current {
>
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists