[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240104060528.GA10504@wunner.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:05:28 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] PCI: Define scoped based management functions
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:17:35PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1170,6 +1170,7 @@ int pci_get_interrupt_pin(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_dev **bridge);
> u8 pci_common_swizzle(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *pinp);
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev_get(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void pci_dev_put(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +DEFINE_FREE(pci_dev_put, struct pci_dev *, if (_T) pci_dev_put(_T))
pci_dev_put() already performs a NULL pointer check internally.
Why duplicate it here?
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists