[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZZsnvjTsmMrUwWt@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:30:22 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] clk: qcom: Use qcom_branch_set_clk_en()
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:36:00PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Instead of magically poking at the bit0 of branch clocks' CBCR, use
> the newly introduced helper.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sc8280xp.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc8280xp.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
> drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc8280xp.c | 9 +++------
I only reviewed the sc8280xp ones, and with the updated comment this
looks good to me now:
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists