| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240104100527.3908-3-cuibixuan@vivo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:05:27 -0800
From: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...o.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
opensource.kernel@...o.com,
cuibixuan@...o.com
Subject: [PATCH -next v5 2/2] mm: vmscan: add new event to trace shrink lru
From: cuibixuan <cuibixuan@...o.com>
Page reclaim is an important part of memory reclaim, including:
* shrink_active_list(), moves folios from the active LRU to the inactive LRU
* shrink_inactive_list(), shrink lru from inactive LRU list
Add the new events to calculate the execution time to better evaluate
the entire memory recycling ratio.
Example of output:
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353020: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start: nid=0
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end: nid=0 nr_taken=32 nr_active=0 nr_deactivated=32 nr_referenced=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=32 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0
kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353162: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=21 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=11 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...o.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
Changes:
v5: * Use 'DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_start_template' to
replace 'RACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive/active_start'
* Add the explanation for adding new shrink lru events into 'mm: vmscan: add new event to trace shrink lru'
v4: * Add Reviewed-by and Changlog to every patch.
v3: * Swap the positions of 'nid' and 'freeable' to prevent the hole in the trace event.
v2: * Modify trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive() in evict_folios() at the same time to fix build error (Andrew pointed out).
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/vmscan.c | 11 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index b99cd28c9815..4793d952c248 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -395,7 +395,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio,
show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
);
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive,
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_start_template,
+
+ TP_PROTO(int nid),
+
+ TP_ARGS(nid),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(int, nid)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->nid = nid;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("nid=%d", __entry->nid)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_start_template, mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start,
+ TP_PROTO(int nid),
+ TP_ARGS(nid)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_start_template, mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start,
+ TP_PROTO(int nid),
+ TP_ARGS(nid)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end,
TP_PROTO(int nid,
unsigned long nr_scanned, unsigned long nr_reclaimed,
@@ -446,7 +473,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive,
show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
);
-TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
+TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end,
TP_PROTO(int nid, unsigned long nr_taken,
unsigned long nr_active, unsigned long nr_deactivated,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4e3b835c6b4a..a44d9624d60f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1906,6 +1906,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
bool stalled = false;
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start(pgdat->node_id);
+
while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(pgdat, file, sc))) {
if (stalled)
return 0;
@@ -1990,7 +1992,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
if (file)
sc->nr.file_taken += nr_taken;
- trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id,
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end(pgdat->node_id,
nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, file);
return nr_reclaimed;
}
@@ -2028,6 +2030,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
int file = is_file_lru(lru);
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start(pgdat->node_id);
+
lru_add_drain();
spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
@@ -2107,7 +2111,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
lru_note_cost(lruvec, file, 0, nr_rotated);
mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&l_active);
free_unref_page_list(&l_active);
- trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
nr_deactivate, nr_rotated, sc->priority, file);
}
@@ -4524,9 +4528,10 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap
if (list_empty(&list))
return scanned;
retry:
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start(pgdat->node_id);
reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false);
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
- trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id,
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end(pgdat->node_id,
scanned, reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority,
type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists