linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/vdso: shrink vdso/extable.i via IWYU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:14:19 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Tanzir Hasan <tanzirh@...gle.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Nick Desaulniers <nnn@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/vdso: shrink vdso/extable.i via IWYU

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:02:40AM +0000, Tanzir Hasan wrote:

*ugh*

> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>

Do we have _anything_ that would not want stddef.h?  Seriously -
NULL, true, false, offsetof...   At that point I'd rather have
it via -include...

Are we going to spam that include all over the tree?  Because
it'd really be just about everything...