linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:33:39 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add
 qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

On 03/01/2024 17:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:40:02AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 03/01/2024 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/01/2024 03:18, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>> Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera
>>>> subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml        | 512 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 512 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>
>>> This patch fails, as pointed out by Robot.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ah its in Bjorn's 6.8 clock pull tree.
>>
>> I will repost when it hits -next
> 
> How is that helpful? It will still fail, and the media maintainers still
> can't apply this. If you work on linux-next, you'd better be
> aware of and explain the dependencies.
> 
> Rob

Well, it actually is in -next as at the time I posted this patch

https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/blob/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h

per the branch referenced in the cover letter

https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi

Looking at the name of the branch for your bot

20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@...aro.org

Does this branch name in the bot output 
"linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1" imply it built from 
the branch I referenced in the cover letter 
"linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi" ?

Am I getting the base of the build right ?

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@linaro.org/

If not - what is the base of the build ?

---
bod