[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6596ae71.df0a0220.a153a.6407@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:11:11 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
Anand Gore <anand.gore@...adcom.com>,
Kursad Oney <kursad.oney@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Sven Schwermer <sven.schwermer@...ruptive-technologies.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v8 5/5] net: phy: at803x: add LED support for
qca808x
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:48:05PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:01:12 +0100
> Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Add LED support for QCA8081 PHY.
> >
> > Documentation for this LEDs PHY is very scarce even with NDA access
> > to Documentation for OEMs. Only the blink pattern are documented and are
> > very confusing most of the time. No documentation is present about
> > forcing the LED on/off or to always blink.
> >
> > Those settings were reversed by poking the regs and trying to find the
> > correct bits to trigger these modes. Some bits mode are not clear and
> > maybe the documentation option are not 100% correct. For the sake of LED
> > support the reversed option are enough to add support for current LED
> > APIs.
>
> I have one small comment below :
>
> > +static int qca808x_led_blink_set(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 index,
> > + unsigned long *delay_on,
> > + unsigned long *delay_off)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + u16 reg;
> > +
> > + if (index > 2)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + reg = QCA808X_MMD7_LED_FORCE_CTRL(index);
> > +
> > + /* Set blink to 50% off, 50% on at 4Hz by default */
> > + ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_AN, QCA808X_MMD7_LED_GLOBAL,
> > + QCA808X_LED_BLINK_FREQ_MASK | QCA808X_LED_BLINK_DUTY_MASK,
> > + QCA808X_LED_BLINK_FREQ_256HZ | QCA808X_LED_BLINK_DUTY_50_50);
>
> The comment (4Hz) and the blink frequency (256Hz) don't match, is that
> right ? because I see there exists a QCA808X_LED_BLINK_FREQ_4HZ
> definition, shouldn't it be used ?
>
Thanks for checking this, oversight by me! Will fix. (the blink
frequency was discovered only lately)
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists