[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240104151655.oiqtn6onge2etlcn@quack3>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:16:55 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com,
colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
dsterba@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.com, konishi.ryusuke@...il.com,
willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de,
p.raghav@...sung.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 for-6.8/block 02/17] xen/blkback: use bdev api in
xen_update_blkif_status()
Hi Kuai!
On Thu 04-01-24 20:19:05, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 在 2024/01/04 19:06, Jan Kara 写道:
> > On Thu 21-12-23 16:56:57, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > Avoid to access bd_inode directly, prepare to remove bd_inode from
> > > block_devcie.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > index e34219ea2b05..e645afa4af57 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > @@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ static void xen_update_blkif_status(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
> > > xenbus_dev_error(blkif->be->dev, err, "block flush");
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > - invalidate_inode_pages2(
> > > - blkif->vbd.bdev_handle->bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
> > > + invalidate_bdev(blkif->vbd.bdev_handle->bdev);
> >
> > This function uses invalidate_inode_pages2() while invalidate_bdev() ends
> > up using mapping_try_invalidate() and there are subtle behavioral
> > differences between these two (for example invalidate_inode_pages2() tries
> > to clean dirty pages using the ->launder_folio method). So I think you'll
> > need helper like invalidate_bdev2() for this.
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch, I know the differenct between then,
> what I don't understand is that why using invalidate_inode_pages2()
> here.
Well, then the change in behavior should be at least noted in the
changelog.
> sync_blockdev() is just called and 0 is returned, I think in this
> case it's safe to call invalidate_bdev() directly, or am I missing
> other things?
I still think there's a difference. invalidate_inode_pages2() also unmaps
memory mappings which mapping_try_invalidate() does not do. That being said
in xen_update_blkif_status() we seem to be bringing up a virtual block
device so before this function is called, anybody would have hard time
using anything in it. But this definitely needs a confirmation from Xen
maintainers and a good documentation of the behavioral change in the
changelog.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists