lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240103212506.41432d12@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:25:06 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Christian Brauner
 <brauner@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracefs/eventfs: Use root and instance inodes as
 default ownership

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:48:37 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 08:32:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > +	/* Get the tracefs root from the parent */
> > +	inode = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
> > +	inode = d_inode(inode->i_sb->s_root);  
> 
> That makes no sense.  First of all, for any positive dentry we have
> dentry->d_sb == dentry->d_inode->i_sb.  And it's the same for all
> dentries on given superblock.  So what's the point of that dance?
> If you want the root inode, just go for d_inode(dentry->d_sb->s_root)
> and be done with that...

That was more of thinking that the dentry and dentry->d_parent are
different. As dentry is part of eventfs and dentry->d_parent is part of
tracefs. Currently they both have the same superblock so yeah, I could just
write it that way too and it would work. But in my head, I was thinking
that they behave differently and maybe one day eventfs would get its own
superblock which would not work.

To explain this better:

  /sys/kernel/tracing/ is the parent of /sys/kernel/tracing/events

But everything but "events" in /sys/kernel/tracing/* is part of tracefs.
Everything in /sys/kernel/tracing/events is part of eventfs.

That was my thought process. But as both tracefs and eventfs still use
tracefs_get_inode(), it would work as you state.

I'll update that, as I don't foresee that eventfs will become its own file
system.

Thanks,

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ