[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240104174101.oax6zbdhy4v5u4bf@quack3>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:41:01 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: shr@...kernel.io, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: fix arithmetic for max_prop_frac when setting
max_ratio
On Tue 19-12-23 22:25:08, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> Since now bdi->max_ratio is part per million, fix the wrong arithmetic
> for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio. Otherwise the miscalculated
> max_prop_frac will affect the incrementing of writeout completion count
> when max_ratio is not 100%.
>
> Fixes: efc3e6ad53ea ("mm: split off __bdi_set_max_ratio() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Good catch. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 2140382dd768..05e5c425b3ff 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,8 @@ static int __bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ra
> ret = -EINVAL;
> } else {
> bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
> - bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
> + bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) /
> + (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
>
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists