linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: sophgo: add misc MFD for Sophgo CV1800 series SoC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJRtX8Q+MpR=SOfZC-_FEBRF7f4UByx+1wVO-761Fs=y9=HCMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:54:07 +0800
From: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, 
	linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dlan@...too.org, inochiama@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: sophgo: add misc MFD for Sophgo
 CV1800 series SoC.

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 8:03 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2024 12:42, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> ties: false
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +examples:
> >>>>> +  - |
> >>>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +    misc@...5000 {
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> misc can be anything.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, there are RTC and (Power On Reset/POR) here. I can't find a suitable
> >>> word to describe him. Can you give me some advice?
> >>
> >> Then maybe just rtc? If there is nothing else, why RTC is separate subnode?
> >>
> >
> > There is also a por submodule used to provide power off and restart functions.
> > Do you mean to use RTC as the parent node like this.
> > rtc{
> >     //something
> >     por{
> >     }
>
> por is empty in your binding, so there is little point in having it as
> subnode.

Thanks for your patient reply. I will remove POR from RTC and
clearly state their relationship in the description.

Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu