[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202401051804.77722270-oliver.sang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 18:08:30 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@...wei.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<longman@...hat.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>, <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
<liwei391@...wei.com>, <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/osq_lock: Avoid false sharing in
optimistic_spin_node
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 15.3% improvement of fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_72_bufferedio.works/sec on:
commit: 511ac0a137f4211f42aa2ba168e50550b703bb7c ("[PATCH v2] locking/osq_lock: Avoid false sharing in optimistic_spin_node")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zeng-Heng/locking-osq_lock-Avoid-false-sharing-in-optimistic_spin_node/20231222-200921
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git a51749ab34d9e5dec548fe38ede7e01e8bb26454
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231222121040.2635879-1-zengheng4@huawei.com/
patch subject: [PATCH v2] locking/osq_lock: Avoid false sharing in optimistic_spin_node
testcase: fxmark
test machine: 128 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358 CPU @ 2.60GHz (Ice Lake) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1SSD
media: ssd
test: DWOM
fstype: xfs
directio: bufferedio
cpufreq_governor: performance
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240105/202401051804.77722270-oliver.sang@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/directio/disk/fstype/kconfig/media/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/bufferedio/1SSD/xfs/x86_64-rhel-8.3/ssd/debian-11.1-x86_64-20220510.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp5/DWOM/fxmark
commit:
a51749ab34 ("locking/mutex: Document that mutex_unlock() is non-atomic")
511ac0a137 ("locking/osq_lock: Avoid false sharing in optimistic_spin_node")
a51749ab34d9e5de 511ac0a137f4211f42aa2ba168e
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
19727 ± 6% -13.5% 17073 ± 6% vmstat.system.cs
19254 ± 7% -13.4% 16678 ± 7% perf-stat.i.context-switches
19499 ± 6% -13.6% 16851 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.context-switches
105.12 ± 13% +115.9% 227.00 ± 9% perf-c2c.DRAM.local
5028 ± 2% -9.1% 4571 ± 2% perf-c2c.DRAM.remote
3526 ± 3% -13.8% 3040 ± 3% perf-c2c.HITM.remote
77565522 ± 2% +11.2% 86238276 ± 3% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_18_bufferedio.works
1551311 ± 2% +11.2% 1724766 ± 3% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_18_bufferedio.works/sec
61955316 +12.3% 69564863 fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_36_bufferedio.works
1239107 +12.3% 1391298 fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_36_bufferedio.works/sec
2.21 ± 4% +9.2% 2.41 ± 2% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_4_bufferedio.user_sec
1.10 ± 4% +9.3% 1.20 ± 2% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_4_bufferedio.user_util
46595523 +16.2% 54146121 ± 2% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_54_bufferedio.works
931911 +16.2% 1082933 ± 2% fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_54_bufferedio.works/sec
44518641 +15.3% 51332276 fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_72_bufferedio.works
890372 +15.3% 1026646 fxmark.ssd_xfs_DWOM_72_bufferedio.works/sec
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists