lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240105101324.26811-5-michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:13:22 +0100
From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
To: <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Michal Wajdeczko
	<michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
	<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Javier Martinez Canillas
	<javierm@...hat.com>, Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/tests: managed: Add comments and expect fail messages

Add comments explaining the intention behind the test and certain
implementation details related to device lifetime.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
index e4790ae838ba7..986a38c9144a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_managed_test.c
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ static void drm_action(struct drm_device *drm, void *ptr)
 	priv->action_done = true;
 }
 
+/*
+ * The test verifies that the release action is called automatically when the
+ * device is released.
+ */
 static void drm_test_managed_run_action(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct managed_test_priv *priv;
@@ -32,6 +36,11 @@ static void drm_test_managed_run_action(struct kunit *test)
 	dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
 
+	/*
+	 * DRM device can't be embedded in priv, since priv->action_done needs
+	 * to remain allocated beyond both parent device and drm_device
+	 * lifetime.
+	 */
 	drm = __drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, sizeof(*drm), 0, DRIVER_MODESET);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm);
 
@@ -44,7 +53,7 @@ static void drm_test_managed_run_action(struct kunit *test)
 	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 	drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, dev);
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, priv->action_done);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, priv->action_done, "Release action was not called");
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case drm_managed_tests[] = {
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ