linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unused if_dclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:04:55 +0800
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unused if_dclk_rate variable

Hi:

On 1/4/24 23:58, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Christian, Andy,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2024, 15:39:50 CET schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
>> Commit 5a028e8f062f ("drm/rockchip: vop2: Add support for rk3588")
>> introduced a variable which ended up being unused.  Remove it.
>>
>> rockchip_drm_vop2.c:1688:23: warning: variable ‘if_dclk_rate’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
> 
> in general, please don't send non-series patches as replies to other patches.
> It confuses tooling like b4 way too often, as this patch is not designated
> as a 2/2 (similar to the first one not being 1/2).
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 2 --
>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> index 44508c2dd614..923985d4161b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> @@ -1685,7 +1685,6 @@ static unsigned long rk3588_calc_cru_cfg(struct vop2_video_port *vp, int id,
>>   	unsigned long dclk_core_rate = v_pixclk >> 2;
>>   	unsigned long dclk_rate = v_pixclk;
>>   	unsigned long dclk_out_rate;
>> -	unsigned long if_dclk_rate;
>>   	unsigned long if_pixclk_rate;
>>   	int K = 1;
>>   
>> @@ -1700,7 +1699,6 @@ static unsigned long rk3588_calc_cru_cfg(struct vop2_video_port *vp, int id,
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		if_pixclk_rate = (dclk_core_rate << 1) / K;
>> -		if_dclk_rate = dclk_core_rate / K;
>>   		/*
>>   		 * *if_pixclk_div = dclk_rate / if_pixclk_rate;
>>   		 * *if_dclk_div = dclk_rate / if_dclk_rate;
>>   		 */
> 		*if_pixclk_div = 2;
> 		*if_dclk_div = 4;
> 
> with the code continuing with those static constants but the comment
> showing a forumula, I do hope Andy can provide a bit of insight into
> what is happening here.
> 
> I.e. I'd really like to understand if that really is just a remnant or
> something different is needed.

This is not a remnant, in my V1, I calculate all the div by formula, but Sascha prefer
more for a constants value[0], so I keep this formula as comments to indicate how these value come from.

[0]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20231114112855.1771372-1-andyshrk@163.com/
> 
> 
> Heiko
> 
>