[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d2bb04665d19a4722a0b9f7f552cab3@manguebit.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:04:43 -0300
From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>, Steve French
<sfrench@...ba.org>, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>, Shyam Prasad N
<sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Ben Hutchings
<benh@...ian.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Information on use-after-free in smb2_is_status_io_timeout()?
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> writes:
> There is a Red Hat bugzilla report in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154178 about a
> use-after-free in smb2_is_status_io_timeout() . While the commit noted
> initially there seems not correct, Ben Hutchings raised a question on
> more information in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154178#c24 .
>
> (there is a CVE assigned for it, CVE-2023-1192)
That is supposed to be fixed by
d527f51331ca ("cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread()")
While the commit refers to an UAF in ->is_network_name_deleted(), this
should also work for smb2_is_status_io_timeout(), AFAICT.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists