linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] IOMMU memory observability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:33:38 -0500
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, alyssa@...enzweig.io, 
	asahi@...ts.linux.dev, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, 
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, david@...hat.com, 
	dwmw2@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, heiko@...ech.de, 
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, 
	joro@...tes.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com, marcan@...can.st, 
	mhiramat@...nel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, paulmck@...nel.org, 
	rdunlap@...radead.org, robin.murphy@....com, samuel@...lland.org, 
	suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, sven@...npeter.dev, thierry.reding@...il.com, 
	tj@...nel.org, tomas.mudrunka@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com, wens@...e.org, 
	will@...nel.org, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] IOMMU memory observability

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:02 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:12:26PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com> wrote:
> > Yes, we will have a difference between GFP_ACCOUNT and what
> > NR_IOMMU_PAGES shows. GFP_ACCOUNT is set only where it makes sense to
> > charge to user processes, i.e. IOMMU Page Tables, but there more IOMMU
> > shared data that should not really be charged to a specific process.
>
> I see. I'd suggest adding this explanation to commit 10/10 message
> (perhaps with some ballpark numbers of pages). In order to have a
> reference and understadning if someone decided to charge (and limit) all
> in the future.

Sure, I will update the commit log in 10/10 with this info if we will have v4.

Pasha

>
> Thanks,
> Michal