| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240105160103.183092-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:01:00 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Ben Horgan <Ben.Horgan@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by
converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list().
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- None.
Iuliana/Daniel I am ccing you to request help with test/review of this change.
Note that, you will need patch 1/5 in the series too, to be able to test this.
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 82 ++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 8fcda9b74545..0409b7c47d5c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -103,12 +103,10 @@ enum imx_dsp_rp_mbox_messages {
* @tx_ch: mailbox tx channel handle
* @rx_ch: mailbox rx channel handle
* @rxdb_ch: mailbox rx doorbell channel handle
- * @pd_dev: power domain device
- * @pd_dev_link: power domain device link
+ * @pd_list: power domain list
* @ipc_handle: System Control Unit ipc handle
* @rproc_work: work for processing virtio interrupts
* @pm_comp: completion primitive to sync for suspend response
- * @num_domains: power domain number
* @flags: control flags
*/
struct imx_dsp_rproc {
@@ -121,12 +119,10 @@ struct imx_dsp_rproc {
struct mbox_chan *tx_ch;
struct mbox_chan *rx_ch;
struct mbox_chan *rxdb_ch;
- struct device **pd_dev;
- struct device_link **pd_dev_link;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc_handle;
struct work_struct rproc_work;
struct completion pm_comp;
- int num_domains;
u32 flags;
};
@@ -954,74 +950,14 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
static int imx_dsp_attach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
{
struct device *dev = priv->rproc->dev.parent;
- int ret, i;
-
- priv->num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
- "power-domains",
- "#power-domain-cells");
-
- /* If only one domain, then no need to link the device */
- if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
- return 0;
-
- priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
- sizeof(*priv->pd_dev),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_domains,
- sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
- priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
- goto detach_pm;
- }
-
- /*
- * device_link_add will check priv->pd_dev[i], if it is
- * NULL, then will break.
- */
- priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev,
- priv->pd_dev[i],
- DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
- DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto detach_pm;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-detach_pm:
- while (--i >= 0) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
-{
- int i;
+ int ret;
- if (priv->num_domains <= 1)
+ /* A single PM domain is already attached. */
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
return 0;
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_domains; i++) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return 0;
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &priv->pd_list);
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}
/**
@@ -1153,7 +1089,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_detach_domains:
- imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
err_put_rproc:
rproc_free(rproc);
@@ -1167,7 +1103,7 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
rproc_del(rproc);
- imx_dsp_detach_pm_domains(priv);
+ dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list);
rproc_free(rproc);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists