linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/47] 5.4.266-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77569e45-ab73-4049-b90e-cd60cbb872ef@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:04:49 -0600
From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/47] 5.4.266-rc1 review

Hello!

On 05/01/24 8:38 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.266 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Jan 2024 14:38:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.266-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Quick note that there are Arm32 failures:

-----8<-----
   /builds/linux/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c: In function 'sysc_reset':
   /builds/linux/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c:1847:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsleep'; did you mean 'ssleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1847 |    fsleep(ddata->cfg.srst_udelay);
         |    ^~~~~~
         |    ssleep
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
   make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262: drivers/bus/ti-sysc.o] Error 1
----->8-----

This is with the following configurations:
* clang-17-defconfig
* clang-17-lkftconfig
* clang-17-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
* clang-17-omap2plus_defconfig
* clang-lkftconfig
* clang-nightly-defconfig
* clang-nightly-lkftconfig
* clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
* clang-nightly-omap2plus_defconfig
* gcc-8-defconfig
* gcc-8-omap2plus_defconfig
* gcc-10-lkftconfig
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-debug
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-kselftest-kernel
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-libgpiod
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-perf-kernel
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-rcutorture
* gcc-12-defconfig
* gcc-12-lkftconfig
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture
* gcc-12-omap2plus_defconfig

A reproducer:

   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig defconfig

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org