linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.335-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5bf8a4d9-2a83-4503-b041-09c45207fe0c@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:23:00 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/21] 4.14.335-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 05/01/2024 14:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.335 release.
> There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Jan 2024 14:38:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.335-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

...


> Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
>      pinctrl: at91-pio4: use dedicated lock class for IRQ


I am seeing the following build error for ARM ...

drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function ‘atmel_pinctrl_probe’:
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1054:3: error: too many arguments to function ‘irq_set_lockdep_class’
    irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &atmel_lock_key, &atmel_request_key);
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:517:0,
                  from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:7,
                  from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:18:
include/linux/irqdesc.h:250:1: note: declared here
  irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am guessing it is the above commit.

Jon
-- 
nvpublic