linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240105164001.2129796-2-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Date: Fri,  5 Jan 2024 08:40:00 -0800
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org, error27@...il.com,
        gustavoars@...nel.org, Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
        Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vegard.nossum@...cle.com, darren.kenny@...cle.com,
        harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()

Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug.

memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg"
at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24)

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237
dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237

Some code commentry, based on my understanding:

544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size)
/// This is 24 + payload_size

memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size);
	Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte
					structure(struct vmci_datagram)
	Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram)
	Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size

{payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32.

 35 struct delayed_datagram_info {
 36         struct datagram_entry *entry;
 37         struct work_struct work;
 38         bool in_dg_host_queue;
 39         /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */
 40         struct vmci_datagram msg;
 41         u8 msg_payload[];
 42 };

So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time
warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller.

One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into
two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload.

Gustavo quoted:
"Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members
in a structure."

Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Suggested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Suggested-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
---
This patch is only tested with the C reproducer, not any testing
specific to driver is done.

v1->v2: ( Suggestions from Gustavo )
        1. Change the commit message false positive --> legitimate
           warning.
        2. Remove unneeded payload_size variable.
        3. Replace first memcpy() with direct assignment.
---
 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c
index ac6cb0c8d99b..ba379cd6d054 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ static int dg_dispatch_as_host(u32 context_id, struct vmci_datagram *dg)
 
 			dg_info->in_dg_host_queue = true;
 			dg_info->entry = dst_entry;
-			memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size);
+			dg_info->msg = *dg;
+			memcpy(&dg_info->msg_payload, dg + 1, dg->payload_size);
 
 			INIT_WORK(&dg_info->work, dg_delayed_dispatch);
 			schedule_work(&dg_info->work);
-- 
2.42.0