Message-ID: <ZZdvDYg6sk8P2JWn@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:53:01 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump: Defer the insertion of crashkernel resources

Huacai,

On 12/29/23 at 04:02pm, Huacai Chen wrote:
> In /proc/iomem, sub-regions should be inserted after their parent,
> otherwise the insertion of parent resource fails. But after generic
> crashkernel reservation applied, in both RISC-V and ARM64 (LoongArch
> will also use generic reservation later on), crashkernel resources are
> inserted before their parent, which causes the parent disappear in
> /proc/iomem. So we defer the insertion of crashkernel resources to an
> early_initcall().
> 
> 1, Without 'crashkernel' parameter:
> 
>  100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00
>    100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00 LOON0001:00
>  100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00
>    100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00 LOON0002:00
>  1fe001e0-1fe001e7 : serial
>  90400000-fa17ffff : System RAM
>    f6220000-f622ffff : Reserved
>    f9ee0000-f9ee3fff : Reserved
>    fa120000-fa17ffff : Reserved
>  fa190000-fe0bffff : System RAM
>    fa190000-fa1bffff : Reserved
>  fe4e0000-47fffffff : System RAM
>    43c000000-441ffffff : Reserved
>    47ff98000-47ffa3fff : Reserved
>    47ffa4000-47ffa7fff : Reserved
>    47ffa8000-47ffabfff : Reserved
>    47ffac000-47ffaffff : Reserved
>    47ffb0000-47ffb3fff : Reserved
> 
> 2, With 'crashkernel' parameter, before this patch:
> 
>  100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00
>    100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00 LOON0001:00
>  100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00
>    100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00 LOON0002:00
>  1fe001e0-1fe001e7 : serial
>  e6200000-f61fffff : Crash kernel
>  fa190000-fe0bffff : System RAM
>    fa190000-fa1bffff : Reserved
>  fe4e0000-47fffffff : System RAM
>    43c000000-441ffffff : Reserved
>    47ff98000-47ffa3fff : Reserved
>    47ffa4000-47ffa7fff : Reserved
>    47ffa8000-47ffabfff : Reserved
>    47ffac000-47ffaffff : Reserved
>    47ffb0000-47ffb3fff : Reserved
> 
> 3, With 'crashkernel' parameter, after this patch:
> 
>  100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00
>    100d0100-100d01ff : LOON0001:00 LOON0001:00
>  100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00
>    100e0000-100e0bff : LOON0002:00 LOON0002:00
>  1fe001e0-1fe001e7 : serial
>  90400000-fa17ffff : System RAM
>    e6200000-f61fffff : Crash kernel
>    f6220000-f622ffff : Reserved
>    f9ee0000-f9ee3fff : Reserved
>    fa120000-fa17ffff : Reserved
>  fa190000-fe0bffff : System RAM
>    fa190000-fa1bffff : Reserved
>  fe4e0000-47fffffff : System RAM
>    43c000000-441ffffff : Reserved
>    47ff98000-47ffa3fff : Reserved
>    47ffa4000-47ffa7fff : Reserved
>    47ffa8000-47ffabfff : Reserved
>    47ffac000-47ffaffff : Reserved
>    47ffb0000-47ffb3fff : Reserved

This looks like a great catch. I am curious where arm64 and loongarch
insert the system RAM range into iomem before crashk_res and
crashk_low_res. On x86, it should be done by pci or acpi init which is
earlier than crashkernel parsing and inserting into iomem, just went\
through codes, haven't adding debugging code to print.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/crash_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index d4313b53837e..755d8d4ef5b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
>  
>  	crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
>  	crashk_low_res.end   = low_base + low_size - 1;
> -	insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
>  #endif
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -459,8 +458,19 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel_generic(char *cmdline,
>  
>  	crashk_res.start = crash_base;
>  	crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
> -	insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res);
>  }
> +
> +static __init int insert_crashkernel_resources(void)
> +{
> +	if (crashk_res.start < crashk_res.end)
> +		insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res);
> +
> +	if (crashk_low_res.start < crashk_low_res.end)
> +		insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(insert_crashkernel_resources);
>  #endif
>  
>  int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_mem *mem, int need_kernel_map,
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists