[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240106104856.GA172473@leoy-huanghe>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 18:48:56 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf doc: Document ring buffer mechanism
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[...]
> > > tools/perf/Documentation/perf-ring-buffer.txt | 762 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 762 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-ring-buffer.txt
> >
> > Nice addition!
> >
> > If it hasn't been picked up yet:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>
> Note that my ack is conditional on the conversion to RST and moving to
> Documentation/ - this documents an important aspect of the primary perf
> ABI, it deserves to be on the kernel side.
I sent patch v8 on the LKML [1], patch v8 has converted the doc to RST
format and with other amending, this is why I didn't add your Acked tag
in it.
Anyway, thanks for review and sorry for my long delayed response.
Leo
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240102085001.228815-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists