linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa.c whitespace cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 16:03:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa.c whitespace cleanup

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 07:39:28PM +0200, Petre Rodan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:34:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 04:34:52PM +0200, Petre Rodan wrote:
> > > Fix indentation and whitespace in code that will not get refactored.
> > > 
> > > Make URL inside comment copy-paste friendly.
> > 
> > >  			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > -				"honeywell,pmin-pascal could not be read\n");
> > > +				   "honeywell,pmin-pascal could not be read\n");
> > 
> > As done elsewhere, here and in other similar places fix the indentation
> > by making first character on the latter line to be in the same column as
> > the first character after the opening parenthesis.
> 
> I triple-checked that I am following the max 80 column rule, the parenthesis
> rule and the 'do not split printk messages' rules in all my code in these 10 patches.
> precisely so I don't get feedback like this one.
> if the parenthesis rule makes the line longer then 80 chars I right-align to
> column 80 as seen above.
> that is what I understand from the latest coding style document and that is what
> I will follow.
> 
> in this particular case if I were to ignore the 80 column rule we would end up on
> column 90 if I were to follow your feedback (open parenthesis is at column 45
> and the error takes 45 chars more).

checkpatch has got an exceptional rule _not_ to warn on the long string
literals for 10+ years. It had happened much earlier than 100 relaxation one.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko