linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: Fix function name in error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 16:00:25 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, jithu.joseph@...el.com
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: Fix function name
 in error message



On 1/6/24 14:41, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Since when the driver was converted to use the bus-based WMI
> interface, the old GUID-based WMI functions are not used anymore.
> Update the error message to avoid confusing users.
> 
> Compile-tested only.
> 
> Fixes: 75c487fcb69c ("platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: Use bus-based WMI interface")
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>


Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> index 9cf5ed0f8dc2..040153ad67c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int get_fwu_request(struct device *dev, u32 *out)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 
>  	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "wmi_query_block returned invalid value\n");
> +		dev_warn(dev, "wmidev_block_query returned invalid value\n");
>  		kfree(obj);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int set_fwu_request(struct device *dev, u32 in)
> 
>  	status = wmidev_block_set(to_wmi_device(dev), 0, &input);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "wmi_set_block failed\n");
> +		dev_err(dev, "wmidev_block_set failed\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

-- 
#Randy