[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xybq2523vgod6rbefw4zjs2kb2xtfmizecdwdjzyl6l2iovjqq@o3q4t2qny55o>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 23:38:46 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Leong Ching Swee <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Teoh Ji Sheng <ji.sheng.teoh@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: stmmac: Add support for TX/RX
channel interrupt
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:09:24PM +0800, Leong Ching Swee wrote:
> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
>
> Enable TX/RX channel interrupt registration for MAC that interrupts CPU
> through shared peripheral interrupt (SPI).
>
> Per channel interrupts and interrupt-names are registered through,
> Eg: 4 tx and 4 rx channels:
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 101 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> <GIC_SPI 104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> <GIC_SPI 105 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> <GIC_SPI 106 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> interrupt-names = "dma_tx0",
> "dma_tx1",
> "dma_tx2",
> "dma_tx3",
> "dma_rx0",
> "dma_rx1",
> "dma_rx2",
> "dma_rx3";
>
> Signed-off-by: Teoh Ji Sheng <ji.sheng.teoh@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
> ---
> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 70eadc83ca68..ae6859153e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -710,6 +710,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_stmmac_probe_config_dt);
> int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct stmmac_resources *stmmac_res)
> {
> + char irq_name[9];
> + int i;
> + int irq;
> +
Reverse xmas tree please. Also what the point in having "i" and "irq"
defined separately? Wouldn't it be better to merge them into a single
statement:
+ char irq_name[9];
+ int i, irq;
> memset(stmmac_res, 0, sizeof(*stmmac_res));
>
> /* Get IRQ information early to have an ability to ask for deferred
> @@ -743,6 +747,30 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
> }
>
> + /* For RX Channel */
Why haven't you added a more descriptive comment as I suggested on v1:
+ /* Get optional Tx/Rx DMA per-channel IRQs, which otherwise
+ * are supposed to be delivered via the common MAC IRQ line
+ */
?
> + for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++) {
> + snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "dma_rx%i", i);
> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
> + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return irq;
> + else if (irq < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + stmmac_res->rx_irq[i] = irq;
> + }
> +
> + /* For TX Channel */
* see the comment above
-Serge(y)
> + for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++) {
> + snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "dma_tx%i", i);
> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
> + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return irq;
> + else if (irq < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + stmmac_res->tx_irq[i] = irq;
> + }
> +
> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists