[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <px2f336zjgibl43utjnnljzjweypu5jxovhgthc4xruidvpl3q@yobulxczk7vh>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 00:24:24 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Leong Ching Swee <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: stmmac: Enable Per DMA Channel
interrupt
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/01/2024 17:40, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:09:21 +0800 you wrote:
> >> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Add Per DMA Channel interrupt feature for DWXGMAC IP.
> >>
> >> Patchset (link below) contains per DMA channel interrupt, But it was
> >> achieved.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230821203328.GA2197059-
> >> robh@...nel.org/t/#m849b529a642e1bff89c05a07efc25d6a94c8bfb4
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> > - [net-next,v2,1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq
> > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/67d47c8ada0f
>
> Please wait for DT bindings review a bit more than one working day (I
> don't count Saturday and Sunday, because we all have some life...).
+1. Would be very nice to have some more time to review the rest of
the bits too. This would be specifically important for the STMMAC
driver which doesn't currently have active maintainer. What about 5-10
work days to make sure that no comment would be submitted? Besides I
thought that no features were supposed to be submitted during the
merge window. Are we over the merge window already? (I might have lost
track of time on the holidays.)
Leong, next time before re-submitting your patchsets please wait for
some more time than just two days. I waited for your response for
almost two weeks.
-Serge(y)
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists