| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABBYNZLNeKOT0n=D-PN=aPgfu07xZ-x8nNKitas40X=0Snp4jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:41:19 -0500
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Bluetooth: Remove pending ACL connection attempts
Hi Jonas,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:29 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On 1/8/24 20:14, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:55 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/8/24 19:44, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>> On 1/8/24 19:39, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>>> With the last commit we moved to using the hci_sync queue for "Create
> >>>> Connection" requests, removing the need for retrying the paging after
> >>>> finished/failed "Create Connection" requests and after the end of
> >>>> inquiries.
> >>>>
> >>>> hci_conn_check_pending() was used to trigger this retry, we can remove it
> >>>> now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that we can also remove the special handling for COMMAND_DISALLOWED
> >>>> errors in the completion handler of "Create Connection", because "Create
> >>>> Connection" requests are now always serialized.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is somewhat reverting commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support
> >>>> concurrent connect requests").
> >>>>
> >>>> With this, the BT_CONNECT2 state of ACL hci_conn objects should now be
> >>>> back to meaning only one thing: That we received a connection request
> >>>> from another device (see hci_conn_request_evt), but the actual connect
> >>>> should be deferred.
> >>>> ---
> >>>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 -
> >>>> net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 16 ----------------
> >>>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> >>>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> index 2c30834c1..d7483958d 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> @@ -1330,7 +1330,6 @@ struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst,
> >>>> u8 role);
> >>>> void hci_conn_del(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>> void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>> struct hci_chan *hci_chan_create(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>> void hci_chan_del(struct hci_chan *chan);
> >>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> index 541d55301..22033057b 100644
> >>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> @@ -2534,22 +2534,6 @@ void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>> -/* Check pending connect attempts */
> >>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>> -{
> >>>> - struct hci_conn *conn;
> >>>> -
> >>>> - BT_DBG("hdev %s", hdev->name);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ACL_LINK, BT_CONNECT2);
> >>>> - if (conn)
> >>>> - hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_acl_create_connection_sync,
> >>>> conn, NULL);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> -}
> >>>> -
> >>>> static u32 get_link_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
> >>>> {
> >>>> u32 link_mode = 0;
> >>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> index e8b4a0126..91973d6d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>> hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
> >>>> hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> - hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> return rp->status;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -149,8 +147,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>> hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PERIODIC_INQ);
> >>>> - hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> return rp->status;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -2296,10 +2292,8 @@ static void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>> {
> >>>> bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", status);
> >>>> - if (status) {
> >>>> - hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> + if (status)
> >>>> return;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags);
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -2323,12 +2317,9 @@ static void hci_cs_create_conn(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>> if (status) {
> >>>> if (conn && conn->state == BT_CONNECT) {
> >>>> - if (status != HCI_ERROR_COMMAND_DISALLOWED ||
> >>>> conn->attempt > 2) {
> >>>> - conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>> - hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>> - hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>> - } else
> >>>> - conn->state = BT_CONNECT2;
> >>>> + conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>> + hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>> + hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>> }
> >>>> } else {
> >>>> if (!conn) {
> >>>> @@ -3020,8 +3011,6 @@ static void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct
> >>>> hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >>>> bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", ev->status);
> >>>> - hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
> >>>> return;
> >>>> @@ -3247,8 +3236,6 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>> unlock:
> >>>> hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> }
> >>>> static void hci_reject_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
> >>>
> >>> Please take a special look at this one: I'm not sure if I'm breaking the
> >>> functionality of deferred connecting using BT_CONNECT2 in
> >>> hci_conn_request_evt() here, as I don't see anywhere where we check for
> >>> this state and establish a connection later.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that this is how hci_conn_request_evt() was initially written
> >>> though, hci_conn_check_pending() only got introduced later and seems
> >>> unrelated.
> >>
> >> Ahh nevermind... The check for BT_CONNECT2 on "Conn Complete event" got
> >> introduced with 4c67bc74f01 ([Bluetooth] Support concurrent connect
> >> requests). And later the deferred connection setup on "Conn Request
> >> event" got introduced with 20714bfef8 ("Bluetooth: Implement deferred
> >> sco socket setup").
> >>
> >> I assume the latter commit was relying on the "Create Connection"
> >> request "Conn Complete event" that got introduced with the former commit
> >> then? That would imply that we use BT_CONNECT2 if there's already a
> >> "Create Connection" going on when the "Conn Request event" happens, and
> >> we must wait for that existing request to finish.. Is that how those
> >> deferred connections are supposed to work?
> >
> > Well if you are not sure that works we better make sure we have tests
> > that cover this, for LE I know for sure it works because we have the
> > likes of iso-tester that do connect 2 peers simultaneously, but for
> > classic I don't recall having any test that does multiple connections.
>
> The sequential "Create Connection" logic works, I tested that (of course
> I'm happy to add tests if it's not too much work).
>
> What I'm unsure about is if and how incoming connection requests from
> other devices with HCI_PROTO_DEFER flag are supposed to work and whether
> they are meant to trigger a "Create Connection" from us?
For incoming connections on Classic that should result in an
accept/reject connection command, so it should cause another Create
Connection if that is what you are afraid of.
> >
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jonas
> >
> >
> >
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists