linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68k: Fix interrupt stack frames for 68000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PX=g+tVRYwhXkrPK421RW7ba1M1H2pM_AR6sJNx+oTFwjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 19:17:49 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: gerg@...ux-m68k.org, fthain@...ux-m68k.org, 
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68k: Fix interrupt stack frames for 68000

Hi Geert,

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 18:56, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> I think it would be better to use the classic m68k stack frame.
> That would pave the way for building a single nommu kernel for
> MC680[012346]0 that runs on e.g. any Amiga.
> MC68000 and Coldfire are incompatible anyway.

Ok, I'll work that out. I have an A600 with an 020 board so I could
actually test it on real hardware. :)

Cheers,

Daniel