lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240108102331.7de98cab@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:23:31 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro
 <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracefs/eventfs: Use root and instance inodes as
 default ownership

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:04:54 +0100
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:

> > > IOW, the inode_permission() in lookup_one_len() that eventfs does is
> > > redundant and just wrong.  
> > 
> > I don't think so.  
> 
> I'm very well aware that the dentries and inode aren't created during
> mkdir but the completely directory layout is determined. You're just
> splicing in dentries and inodes during lookup and readdir.
> 
> If mkdir /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/foo has succeeded and you later
> do a lookup/readdir on
> 
> ls -al /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/foo/events
> 
> Why should the creation of the dentries and inodes ever fail due to a
> permission failure?

They shouldn't.

> The vfs did already verify that you had the required
> permissions to list entries in that directory. Why should filling up
> /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/foo/events ever fail then? It shouldn't
> That tracefs instance would be half-functional. And again, right now
> that inode_permission() check cannot even fail.

And it shouldn't. But without dentries and inodes, how does VFS know what
is allowed to open the files?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ