[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2026945-76ab-4224-b3af-b6991e16d282@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:24:55 +0100
From: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/1] fpga: add an owner and use it to take the
low-level module's refcount
On 2024-01-08 10:07, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 12:15:26AM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
>> Add a module owner field to the fpga_manager struct to take the
>> low-level control module refcount instead of assuming that the parent
>> device has a driver and using its owner pointer. The owner is now
>> passed as an additional argument at registration time. To this end,
>> the functions for registration have been modified to take an additional
>> owner parameter and renamed to avoid conflicts. The old function names
>> are now used for helper macros that automatically set the module that
>> registers the fpga manager as the owner. This ensures compatibility
>> with existing low-level control modules and reduces the chances of
>> registering a manager without setting the owner.
>>
>> To detect when the owner module pointer becomes stale, set the mops
>> pointer to null during fpga_mgr_unregister() and test it before taking
>> the module's refcount. Use a mutex to protect against a crash that can
>> happen if __fpga_mgr_get() gets suspended between testing the mops
>> pointer and taking the refcount while the low-level module is being
>> unloaded.
>>
>> Other changes: opportunistically move put_device() from __fpga_mgr_get()
>> to fpga_mgr_get() and of_fpga_mgr_get() to improve code clarity since
>> the device refcount in taken in these functions.
>>
>> Fixes: 654ba4cc0f3e ("fpga manager: ensure lifetime with of_fpga_mgr_get")
>> Suggested-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> index 06651389c592..d7bfbdfdf2fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
>> @@ -664,20 +664,20 @@ static struct attribute *fpga_mgr_attrs[] = {
>> };
>> ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fpga_mgr);
>>
>> -static struct fpga_manager *__fpga_mgr_get(struct device *dev)
>> +static struct fpga_manager *__fpga_mgr_get(struct device *mgr_dev)
>> {
>> struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>>
>> - mgr = to_fpga_manager(dev);
>> + mgr = to_fpga_manager(mgr_dev);
>>
>> - if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner))
>> - goto err_dev;
>> + mutex_lock(&mgr->mops_mutex);
>>
>> - return mgr;
>> + if (!mgr->mops || !try_module_get(mgr->mops_owner))
>
> Why move the owner out of struct fpga_manager_ops? The owner within the
> ops struct makes more sense to me, it better illustrates what the mutex
> is protecting.
>
I think having the owner in fpga_manager_ops made sense when it was
meant to be set while initializing the struct in the low-level module.
However, since the owner is now passed as an argument and set at
registration time, keeping it in the FPGA manager context seems more
straightforward to me.
>> + mgr = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> -err_dev:
>> - put_device(dev);
>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->mops_mutex);
>> +
>> + return mgr;
>> }
>>
>> static int fpga_mgr_dev_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>> @@ -693,12 +693,18 @@ static int fpga_mgr_dev_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *fpga_mgr_get(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> - struct device *mgr_dev = class_find_device(&fpga_mgr_class, NULL, dev,
>> - fpga_mgr_dev_match);
>> + struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>> + struct device *mgr_dev;
>> +
>> + mgr_dev = class_find_device(&fpga_mgr_class, NULL, dev, fpga_mgr_dev_match);
>> if (!mgr_dev)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> - return __fpga_mgr_get(mgr_dev);
>> + mgr = __fpga_mgr_get(mgr_dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mgr))
>> + put_device(mgr_dev);
>> +
>> + return mgr;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_get);
>>
>> @@ -711,13 +717,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_get);
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *of_fpga_mgr_get(struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> - struct device *dev;
>> + struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>> + struct device *mgr_dev;
>>
>> - dev = class_find_device_by_of_node(&fpga_mgr_class, node);
>> - if (!dev)
>> + mgr_dev = class_find_device_by_of_node(&fpga_mgr_class, node);
>> + if (!mgr_dev)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> - return __fpga_mgr_get(dev);
>> + mgr = __fpga_mgr_get(mgr_dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mgr))
>> + put_device(mgr_dev);
>> +
>> + return mgr;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fpga_mgr_get);
>>
>> @@ -727,7 +738,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fpga_mgr_get);
>> */
>> void fpga_mgr_put(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
>> {
>> - module_put(mgr->dev.parent->driver->owner);
>> + module_put(mgr->mops_owner);
>> put_device(&mgr->dev);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_put);
>> @@ -766,9 +777,10 @@ void fpga_mgr_unlock(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_unlock);
>>
>> /**
>> - * fpga_mgr_register_full - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> + * __fpga_mgr_register_full - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> * @info: parameters for fpga manager
>> + * @owner: owner module containing the ops
>> *
>> * The caller of this function is responsible for calling fpga_mgr_unregister().
>> * Using devm_fpga_mgr_register_full() instead is recommended.
>> @@ -776,7 +788,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_unlock);
>> * Return: pointer to struct fpga_manager pointer or ERR_PTR()
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info)
>> +__fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info,
>> + struct module *owner)
>> {
>> const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops = info->mops;
>> struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>> @@ -803,6 +816,9 @@ fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *in
>> }
>>
>> mutex_init(&mgr->ref_mutex);
>> + mutex_init(&mgr->mops_mutex);
>> +
>> + mgr->mops_owner = owner;
>>
>> mgr->name = info->name;
>> mgr->mops = info->mops;
>> @@ -841,14 +857,15 @@ fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *in
>>
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_register_full);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_mgr_register_full);
>>
>> /**
>> - * fpga_mgr_register - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> + * __fpga_mgr_register - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> * @name: fpga manager name
>> * @mops: pointer to structure of fpga manager ops
>> * @priv: fpga manager private data
>> + * @owner: owner module containing the ops
>> *
>> * The caller of this function is responsible for calling fpga_mgr_unregister().
>> * Using devm_fpga_mgr_register() instead is recommended. This simple
>> @@ -859,8 +876,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_register_full);
>> * Return: pointer to struct fpga_manager pointer or ERR_PTR()
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> - const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv)
>> +__fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> + const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv, struct module *owner)
>> {
>> struct fpga_manager_info info = { 0 };
>>
>> @@ -868,9 +885,9 @@ fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> info.mops = mops;
>> info.priv = priv;
>>
>> - return fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, &info);
>> + return __fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, &info, owner);
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_register);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_mgr_register);
>>
>> /**
>> * fpga_mgr_unregister - unregister an FPGA manager
>> @@ -888,6 +905,12 @@ void fpga_mgr_unregister(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
>> */
>> fpga_mgr_fpga_remove(mgr);
>>
>> + mutex_lock(&mgr->mops_mutex);
>> +
>> + mgr->mops = NULL;
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->mops_mutex);
>> +
>> device_unregister(&mgr->dev);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_unregister);
>> @@ -900,9 +923,10 @@ static void devm_fpga_mgr_unregister(struct device *dev, void *res)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * devm_fpga_mgr_register_full - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> + * __devm_fpga_mgr_register_full - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> * @info: parameters for fpga manager
>> + * @owner: owner module containing the ops
>> *
>> * Return: fpga manager pointer on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> *
>> @@ -910,7 +934,8 @@ static void devm_fpga_mgr_unregister(struct device *dev, void *res)
>> * function will be called automatically when the managing device is detached.
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info)
>> +__devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info,
>> + struct module *owner)
>> {
>> struct fpga_mgr_devres *dr;
>> struct fpga_manager *mgr;
>> @@ -919,7 +944,7 @@ devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_inf
>> if (!dr)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> - mgr = fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info);
>> + mgr = __fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info, owner);
>> if (IS_ERR(mgr)) {
>> devres_free(dr);
>> return mgr;
>> @@ -930,14 +955,15 @@ devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_inf
>>
>> return mgr;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_fpga_mgr_register_full);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__devm_fpga_mgr_register_full);
>>
>> /**
>> - * devm_fpga_mgr_register - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> + * __devm_fpga_mgr_register - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> * @name: fpga manager name
>> * @mops: pointer to structure of fpga manager ops
>> * @priv: fpga manager private data
>> + * @owner: owner module containing the ops
>> *
>> * Return: fpga manager pointer on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> *
>> @@ -946,8 +972,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_fpga_mgr_register_full);
>> * device is detached.
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> - const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv)
>> +__devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> + const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv,
>> + struct module *owner)
>> {
>> struct fpga_manager_info info = { 0 };
>>
>> @@ -955,9 +982,9 @@ devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> info.mops = mops;
>> info.priv = priv;
>>
>> - return devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, &info);
>> + return __devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, &info, owner);
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_fpga_mgr_register);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__devm_fpga_mgr_register);
>>
>> static void fpga_mgr_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> index 54f63459efd6..967540311462 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h
>> @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ struct fpga_manager_ops {
>> * @state: state of fpga manager
>> * @compat_id: FPGA manager id for compatibility check.
>> * @mops: pointer to struct of fpga manager ops
>> + * @mops_mutex: protects mops from low-level module removal
>> + * @mops_owner: module containing the mops
>> * @priv: low level driver private date
>> */
>> struct fpga_manager {
>> @@ -210,6 +212,8 @@ struct fpga_manager {
>> enum fpga_mgr_states state;
>> struct fpga_compat_id *compat_id;
>> const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops;
>> + struct mutex mops_mutex;
>> + struct module *mops_owner;
>> void *priv;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -222,6 +226,7 @@ void fpga_image_info_free(struct fpga_image_info *info);
>> int fpga_mgr_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct fpga_image_info *info);
>>
>> int fpga_mgr_lock(struct fpga_manager *mgr);
>> +
>
> Why adding a line?
>
I'll remove the line.
>> void fpga_mgr_unlock(struct fpga_manager *mgr);
>>
>> struct fpga_manager *of_fpga_mgr_get(struct device_node *node);
>> @@ -230,18 +235,81 @@ struct fpga_manager *fpga_mgr_get(struct device *dev);
>>
>> void fpga_mgr_put(struct fpga_manager *mgr);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * fpga_mgr_register_full - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> + * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> + * @info: parameters for fpga manager
>> + *
>> + * The caller of this function is responsible for calling fpga_mgr_unregister().
>> + * Using devm_fpga_mgr_register_full() instead is recommended.
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to struct fpga_manager pointer or ERR_PTR()
>> + */
>
> No need to duplicate the doc, just remove it.
> Same for the rest of code.
Do you mean keeping the kernel-doc comments only for the __fpga_mgr_*
functions in fpga-mgr.c?
>
>> +#define fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info) \
>> + __fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info, THIS_MODULE)
>> +
>
> Delete the line, and ...
>
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info);
>> +__fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info,
>> + struct module *owner);
>
> Add a line here, to make the related functions packed.
> Same for the rest of code.
Do you prefer having the macro just above the function prototype? Like:
#define devm_fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv) \
__devm_fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv, THIS_MODULE)
struct fpga_manager *
__devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv,
struct module *owner);
>
>> +/**
>> + * fpga_mgr_register - create and register an FPGA Manager device
>> + * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> + * @name: fpga manager name
>> + * @mops: pointer to structure of fpga manager ops
>> + * @priv: fpga manager private data
>> + *
>> + * The caller of this function is responsible for calling fpga_mgr_unregister().
>> + * Using devm_fpga_mgr_register() instead is recommended. This simple
>> + * version of the register function should be sufficient for most users. The
>> + * fpga_mgr_register_full() function is available for users that need to pass
>> + * additional, optional parameters.
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to struct fpga_manager pointer or ERR_PTR()
>> + */
>> +#define fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv) \
>> + __fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv, THIS_MODULE)
>>
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> - const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv);
>> +__fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> + const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv, struct module *owner);
>> +
>> void fpga_mgr_unregister(struct fpga_manager *mgr);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * devm_fpga_mgr_register_full - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> + * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> + * @info: parameters for fpga manager
>> + *
>> + * Return: fpga manager pointer on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> + *
>> + * This is the devres variant of fpga_mgr_register_full() for which the unregister
>> + * function will be called automatically when the managing device is detached.
>> + */
>> +#define devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info) \
>> + __devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(parent, info, THIS_MODULE)
>> +
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info);
>> +__devm_fpga_mgr_register_full(struct device *parent, const struct fpga_manager_info *info,
>> + struct module *owner);
>> +/**
>> + * devm_fpga_mgr_register - resource managed variant of fpga_mgr_register()
>> + * @parent: fpga manager device from pdev
>> + * @name: fpga manager name
>> + * @mops: pointer to structure of fpga manager ops
>> + * @priv: fpga manager private data
>> + *
>> + * Return: fpga manager pointer on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> + *
>> + * This is the devres variant of fpga_mgr_register() for which the
>> + * unregister function will be called automatically when the managing
>> + * device is detached.
>> + */
>> +#define devm_fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv) \
>> + __devm_fpga_mgr_register(parent, name, mops, priv, THIS_MODULE)
>> +
>> struct fpga_manager *
>> -devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> - const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv);
>> +__devm_fpga_mgr_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>> + const struct fpga_manager_ops *mops, void *priv,
>> + struct module *owner);
>>
>> #endif /*_LINUX_FPGA_MGR_H */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists