[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efcc7b97-6bfc-4e5d-8e73-78f2b190fa02@v0yd.nl>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:57:47 +0100
From: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, verdre@...d.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Bluetooth: Improve retrying of connection attempts
Hi Luiz,
On 1/9/24 18:53, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 5:46 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Since commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support concurrent connect
>> requests"), the kernel supports trying to connect again in case the
>> bluetooth card is busy and fails to connect.
>>
>> The logic that should handle this became a bit spotty over time, and also
>> cards these days appear to fail with more errors than just "Command
>> Disallowed".
>>
>> This series refactores the handling of concurrent connection requests
>> by serializing all "Create Connection" commands for ACL connections
>> similar to how we do it for LE connections.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240102185933.64179-1-verdre@v0yd.nl/
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240108183938.468426-1-verdre@v0yd.nl/
>> v3:
>> - Move the new sync function to hci_sync.c as requested by review
>> - Abort connection on failure using hci_abort_conn_sync() instead of
>> hci_abort_conn()
>> - Make the last commit message a bit more precise regarding the meaning
>> of BT_CONNECT2 state
>>
>> Jonas Dreßler (4):
>> Bluetooth: Remove superfluous call to hci_conn_check_pending()
>> Bluetooth: hci_event: Use HCI error defines instead of magic values
>> Bluetooth: hci_conn: Only do ACL connections sequentially
>> Bluetooth: Remove pending ACL connection attempts
>>
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 3 ++
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 -
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.h | 3 ++
>> net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 83 +++-----------------------------
>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 29 +++--------
>> net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
> After rebasing and fixing a little bit here and there, see v4, looks
> like this changes is affecting the following mgmt-tester -s "Pair
> Device - Power off 1":
>
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - init
> Read Version callback
> Status: Success (0x00)
> Version 1.22
> Read Commands callback
> Status: Success (0x00)
> Read Index List callback
> Status: Success (0x00)
> Index Added callback
> Index: 0x0000
> Enable management Mesh interface
> Enabling Mesh feature
> Read Info callback
> Status: Success (0x00)
> Address: 00:AA:01:00:00:00
> Version: 0x09
> Manufacturer: 0x05f1
> Supported settings: 0x0001bfff
> Current settings: 0x00000080
> Class: 0x000000
> Name:
> Short name:
> Mesh feature is enabled
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - setup
> Setup sending Set Bondable (0x0009)
> Setup sending Set Powered (0x0005)
> Initial settings completed
> Test setup condition added, total 1
> Client set connectable: Success (0x00)
> Test setup condition complete, 0 left
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - setup complete
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - run
> Sending Pair Device (0x0019)
> Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0405 tx timeout
> Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0408 tx timeout
> Test condition added, total 1
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - test timed out
> Pair Device (0x0019): Disconnected (0x0e)
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - test not run
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - teardown
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - teardown
> Index Removed callback
> Index: 0x0000
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - teardown complete
> Pair Device - Power off 1 - done
>
Thanks for landing the first two commits!
I think this is actually the same issue causing the test failure
as in the other issue I had:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/7cee4e74-3a0c-4b7c-9984-696e646160f8@v0yd.nl/
It seems that the emulator is unable to reply to HCI commands sent
from the hci_sync machinery, possibly because that is sending things
on a separate thread?
Cheers,
Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists