| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:19:17 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: lockdep warning triggered by 15b9ce7ecd:
virtio_balloon: stay awake while adjusting balloon
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:50:20PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:50 AM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, while doing final testing before sending a pull request, I merged
> > in linux-next, and commit 5b9ce7ecd7: virtio_balloon: stay awake while
> > adjusting balloon seems to be causing a lockdep warning (see attached)
> > when running gce-xfstests on a Google Compute Engine e2 VM. I was not
> > able to trigger it using kvm-xfstests, but the following command:
> > "gce-xfstests -C 10 ext4/4k generic/476) was sufficient to triger the
> > problem. For more information please see [1] and [2].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/gce-xfstests.md
> > [2] https://thunk.org/gce-xfstests
> >
> > I found it by looking at the git logs, and this commit aroused my
> > suspicions, and I further testing showed that the lockdep warning was
> > reproducible with this commit, but not when testing with the
> > immediately preceeding commit (15b9ce7ecd^).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > - Ted
> >
> >
> > root: ext4/4k run xfstest generic/476
> > systemd[1]: Started fstests-generic-476.scope - /usr/bin/bash -c test -w /proc/self/oom_score_adj && echo 250 > /proc/self/oom_score_adj; exec ./tests/generic/476.
> > kernel: [ 399.361181] EXT4-fs (dm-1): mounted filesystem 840e25bd-f650-4819-8562-7eded85ef370 r/w with ordered data mode. Quota mode: none.
> > systemd[1]: fstests-generic-476.scope: Deactivated successfully.
> > systemd[1]: fstests-generic-476.scope: Consumed 3min 1.966s CPU time.
> > systemd[1]: xt\x2dvdb.mount: Deactivated successfully.
> > kernel: [ 537.085404] EXT4-fs (dm-0): unmounting filesystem d3d7a675-f7b6-4384-abec-2e60d885b6da.
> > systemd[1]: xt\x2dvdc.mount: Deactivated successfully.
> > kernel: [ 540.565870]
> > kernel: [ 540.567523] ================================
> > kernel: [ 540.572007] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
> > kernel: [ 540.576407] 6.7.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep-00012-g5b9ce7ecd715 #318 Not tainted
> > kernel: [ 540.583532] --------------------------------
> > kernel: [ 540.587928] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
> > kernel: [ 540.594326] kworker/0:3/329 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> > kernel: [ 540.599955] ffff90b280a548c0 (&vb->adjustment_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: update_balloon_size_func+0x33/0x190
> > kernel: [ 540.609926] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
> > kernel: [ 540.614935] __lock_acquire+0x3f2/0xb30
> > kernel: [ 540.618992] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
> > kernel: [ 540.622786] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x90
> > kernel: [ 540.627366] virtballoon_changed+0x51/0xd0
> > kernel: [ 540.631947] virtio_config_changed+0x5a/0x70
> > kernel: [ 540.636437] vp_config_changed+0x11/0x20
> > kernel: [ 540.640576] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x230
> > kernel: [ 540.645500] handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
> > kernel: [ 540.649558] handle_edge_irq+0x8f/0x1f0
> > kernel: [ 540.653791] __common_interrupt+0x47/0xf0
> > kernel: [ 540.658106] common_interrupt+0x79/0xa0
> > kernel: [ 540.661672] EXT4-fs (dm-1): unmounting filesystem 840e25bd-f650-4819-8562-7eded85ef370.
> > kernel: [ 540.663183] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
> > kernel: [ 540.663190] acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x30
> > kernel: [ 540.663196] acpi_idle_enter+0x7b/0xd0
> > kernel: [ 540.663199] cpuidle_enter_state+0x90/0x4f0
> > kernel: [ 540.688723] cpuidle_enter+0x2d/0x40
> > kernel: [ 540.692516] cpuidle_idle_call+0xe4/0x120
> > kernel: [ 540.697036] do_idle+0x84/0xd0
> > kernel: [ 540.700393] cpu_startup_entry+0x2a/0x30
> > kernel: [ 540.704588] rest_init+0xe9/0x180
> > kernel: [ 540.708118] arch_call_rest_init+0xe/0x30
> > kernel: [ 540.712426] start_kernel+0x41c/0x4b0
> > kernel: [ 540.716310] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
> > kernel: [ 540.721164] x86_64_start_kernel+0x8c/0x90
> > kernel: [ 540.725737] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x178/0x17b
> > kernel: [ 540.731432] irq event stamp: 22681
> > kernel: [ 540.734956] hardirqs last enabled at (22681): [<ffffffff8b4b5158>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50
> > kernel: [ 540.744564] hardirqs last disabled at (22680): [<ffffffff8b4b4ded>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x5d/0x90
> > kernel: [ 540.753475] softirqs last enabled at (22076): [<ffffffff8a58cfa1>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x101/0x1c0
> > kernel: [ 540.762904] softirqs last disabled at (22072): [<ffffffff8a58cfa1>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x101/0x1c0
> > kernel: [ 540.773298]
> > kernel: [ 540.773298] other info that might help us debug this:
> > kernel: [ 540.780207] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > kernel: [ 540.780207]
> > kernel: [ 540.786438] CPU0
> > kernel: [ 540.789007] ----
> > kernel: [ 540.791766] lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> > kernel: [ 540.796014] <Interrupt>
> > kernel: [ 540.798778] lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> > kernel: [ 540.803605]
>
> Oh, that's embarrassing, I completely whiffed on interactions with
> interrupts. The following patch fixes it, and I've locally repro'ed
> the issue and verified the fix. What's the process for getting this
> fix merged? Does it get merged as a seperatch patch, or squashed into
> the original commit?
>
> >From a99a1efa6a2b470a98ea2c87e58bebe90ce329a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:41:21 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix interrupt context deadlock
>
> Use _irq spinlock functions with the adjustment_lock, since
> start_update_balloon_size needs to acquire it in an interrupt context.
>
> Fixes: 5b9ce7ecd715 ("virtio_balloon: stay awake while adjusting balloon")
> Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> index aa6a1a649ad6..1f5b3dd31fcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> @@ -459,12 +459,12 @@ static void start_update_balloon_size(struct
> virtio_balloon *vb)
>
> static void end_update_balloon_size(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
> {
> - spin_lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> if (!vb->adjustment_signal_pending && vb->adjustment_in_progress) {
> vb->adjustment_in_progress = false;
> pm_relax(vb->vdev->dev.parent);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> }
>
> static void virtballoon_changed(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> @@ -506,9 +506,9 @@ static void update_balloon_size_func(struct
> work_struct *work)
> vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
> update_balloon_size_work);
>
> - spin_lock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> vb->adjustment_signal_pending = false;
> - spin_unlock(&vb->adjustment_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&vb->adjustment_lock);
>
> diff = towards_target(vb);
Your patch is damaged (lines wrapped, sha info is wrong). Please post a
new version of the original one I will replace it with the new one.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists