linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: Convert bridge binding to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 11:53:03 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, git@...inx.com,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	kishore Manne <nava.kishore.manne@....com>,
	"open list:FPGA MANAGER FRAMEWORK" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: Convert bridge binding to yaml

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:16:17AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/8/24 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 05/01/2024 17:04, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Convert the generic fpga bridge DT binding to json-schema.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> > 
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fpga/fpga-bridge.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: FPGA Bridge
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  $nodename:
> > > +    pattern: "^fpga-bridge(@.*)?$"
> > 
> > Not sure, but maybe we need to allow fpga-bridge-1? Could we have more
> > than one bridge on given system?
> 
> Yilun: Any comment on this?

We can have more bridges, but IIUC people use fpga-bridge@0, fpga-bridge@0
to identify them. So the expression is OK to me.

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
> > 
> > Anyway, looks fine:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
>