[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a85dbfc3-e327-442a-9aab-5115f86944f7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 20:08:33 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Nícolas F . R . A . Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>, james.quinlan@...adcom.com
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] PCI: introduce the concept of power sequencing of PCIe
devices
Hello,
On 1/4/2024 5:01 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> During last year's Linux Plumbers we had several discussions centered
> around the need to power-on PCI devices before they can be detected on
> the bus.
>
> The consensus during the conference was that we need to introduce a
> class of "PCI slot drivers" that would handle the power-sequencing.
>
> After some additional brain-storming with Manivannan and the realization
> that the DT maintainers won't like adding any "fake" nodes not
> representing actual devices, we decided to reuse the existing
> infrastructure provided by the PCIe port drivers.
>
> The general idea is to instantiate platform devices for child nodes of
> the PCIe port DT node. For those nodes for which a power-sequencing
> driver exists, we bind it and let it probe. The driver then triggers a
> rescan of the PCI bus with the aim of detecting the now powered-on
> device. The device will consume the same DT node as the platform,
> power-sequencing device. We use device links to make the latter become
> the parent of the former.
>
> The main advantage of this approach is not modifying the existing DT in
> any way and especially not adding any "fake" platform devices.
There is prior work in that area which was applied, but eventually reverted:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg119136.html
and finally re-applied albeit in a different shape:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220716222454.29914-1-jim2101024@gmail.com/
so we might want to think about how to have pcie-brcmstb.c converted
over your proposed approach. AFAIR there is also pcie-rockchip.c which
has some rudimentary support for voltage regulators of PCIe end-points.
What does not yet appear in this RFC is support for suspend/resume,
especially for power states where both the RC and the EP might be losing
power. There also needs to be some thoughts given to wake-up enabled
PCIe devices like Wi-Fi which might need to remain powered on to service
Wake-on-WLAN frames if nothing else.
I sense a potential for a lot of custom power sequencing drivers being
added and ultimately leading to the decision to create a "generic" one
which is entirely driven by Device Tree properties...
Thanks for doing this!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists