lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77fb1d8b-0db8-43f4-99bc-705a73dbc820@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 11:57:53 +0100
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To: <joakim.zhang@...tech.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] remoteproc: virtio: Fix wdg cannot recovery remote
 processor



On 12/17/23 06:36, joakim.zhang@...tech.com wrote:
> From: Joakim Zhang <joakim.zhang@...tech.com>
> 
> Recovery remote processor failed when wdg irq received:
> [    0.842574] remoteproc remoteproc0: crash detected in cix-dsp-rproc: type watchdog
> [    0.842750] remoteproc remoteproc0: handling crash #1 in cix-dsp-rproc
> [    0.842824] remoteproc remoteproc0: recovering cix-dsp-rproc
> [    0.843342] remoteproc remoteproc0: stopped remote processor cix-dsp-rproc
> [    0.847901] rproc-virtio rproc-virtio.0.auto: Failed to associate buffer
> [    0.847979] remoteproc remoteproc0: failed to probe subdevices for cix-dsp-rproc: -16
> 
> The reason is that dma coherent mem would not be released when
> recovering the remote processor, due to rproc_virtio_remove()
> would not be called, where the mem released. It will fail when
> it try to allocate and associate buffer again.
> 
> Releasing reserved memory from rproc_virtio_dev_release(), instead of
> rproc_virtio_remove().
> 
> Fixes: 1d7b61c06dc3 ("remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio")
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <joakim.zhang@...tech.com>

LGTM

Acked-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>

Thanks,
Arnaud

> ---
> ChangeLogs:
> V1->V2:
>         * the same for of_reserved_mem_device_release()
> V2->V3:
>         * release reserved memory in rproc_virtio_dev_release()
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index 83d76915a6ad..25b66b113b69 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -351,6 +351,9 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> 
>         kfree(vdev);
> 
> +       of_reserved_mem_device_release(&rvdev->pdev->dev);
> +       dma_release_coherent_memory(&rvdev->pdev->dev);
> +
>         put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev);
>  }
> 
> @@ -584,9 +587,6 @@ static void rproc_virtio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>         rproc_remove_rvdev(rvdev);
> 
> -       of_reserved_mem_device_release(&pdev->dev);
> -       dma_release_coherent_memory(&pdev->dev);
> -
>         put_device(&rproc->dev);
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> 
> This email (including its attachments) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this email or the information herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose any part of this e-mail to others. Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments if you received it in error. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error-free or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ