[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBv5=Td2o_fEcq0E7JumyH6XW705kkKR=sPf+_YzB0aPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 12:24:11 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, lukasz.luba@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
qyousef@...alina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 17:35, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2024 14:48, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Provide to the scheduler a feedback about the temporary max available
> > capacity. Unlike arch_update_thermal_pressure, this doesn't need to be
> > filtered as the pressure will happen for dozens ms or more.
>
> Is this then related to the 'medium pace system pressure' you mentioned
> in your OSPM '23 talk?
Sorry I forgot to answer this question. Yes this is the medium pace
system pressure that I mentioned at OSPM'23
>
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists