[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZ1DIDjGlHP-tmAi@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:59:12 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vram-helper: fix kernel-doc warnings
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:10:12PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 1/8/24 00:57, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for the fix.
> >
> > Am 06.01.24 um 04:29 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> >> Remove the @funcs entry from struct drm_vram_mm to quieten the kernel-doc
> >> warning.
> >>
> >> Use the "define" kernel-doc keyword and an '\' line continuation
> >> to fix another kernel-doc warning.
> >>
> >> drm_gem_vram_helper.h:129: warning: missing initial short description on line:
> >> * DRM_GEM_VRAM_PLANE_HELPER_FUNCS -
> >> drm_gem_vram_helper.h:185: warning: Excess struct member 'funcs' description in 'drm_vram_mm'
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> >> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
> >> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> >> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Add commit description
> >>
> >> base-commit: 610a9b8f49fbcf1100716370d3b5f6f884a2835a
> >>
> >> include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff -- a/include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h
> >> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h
> >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h
> >> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ drm_gem_vram_plane_helper_cleanup_fb(str
> >> struct drm_plane_state *old_state);
> >> /**
> >> - * DRM_GEM_VRAM_PLANE_HELPER_FUNCS -
> >> + * define DRM_GEM_VRAM_PLANE_HELPER_FUNCS - \
> >
> > Did something change wrt. doc syntax? I think this used to work without warnings. About this 'define': we don't use is in another docs. Can we leave it out here or is this the new syntax?
> >
>
> There are no doc syntax changes that I know of. This is not
> new syntax. It has been around since 2014:
> cbb4d3e6510b ("scripts/kernel-doc: handle object-like macros")
I had no idea this exists, thanks a lot for this TIL :-)
I guess the issue here is that this exists, yay, but it's not documented
with the other here:
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#structure-union-and-enumeration-documentation
I guess a patch to kernel-doc.rst would be great. Adding some kernel-doc
folks.
Cheers, Sima
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists