linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] s390/vfio-ap: reset queues removed from guest's AP configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 11:41:03 -0500
From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] s390/vfio-ap: reset queues removed from guest's AP
 configuration


On 1/9/24 3:27 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 1/8/24 17:52, Anthony Krowiak wrote:
>> PING!
>>
> You're waiting for review of the last patch, right?


Patch 6/6 does not have an r-b, so yes, that is one thing. The other's 
have been reviewed internally with some receiving only an acked-by, so I 
guess I'm looking for a final blessing so they can be merged. If I'm not 
mistaken, the primary problem for which theses patches were created - 
i.e., not resetting all queues when an adapter is removed from the guest 
- will cause unique problems for SE guests that are bound/associated. 
That being the case, I think these patches need to be merged sooner 
rather than later.