[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1cycv9h.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:43:38 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@...omium.org>, "Jeff Johnson"
<quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric Dumazet"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo Abeni"
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>, "Konrad
Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, "Catalin Marinas"
<catalin.marinas@....com>, "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, "Bjorn
Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Heiko Stübner
<heiko@...ech.de>, "Jernej
Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, "Chris Morgan"
<macromorgan@...mail.com>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>, "Neil Armstrong"
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>, "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"Peng Fan" <peng.fan@....com>, "Robert Richter" <rrichter@....com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Jonathan Cameron"
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, "Terry Bowman" <terry.bowman@....com>,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, "Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
"Alex Elder" <elder@...aro.org>, "Srinivas Kandagatla"
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Netdev
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/9] PCI/pwrseq: add a pwrseq driver for QCA6390
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 11:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:18 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> > On 1/4/2024 5:01 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
>>>> >> index 010e31f432c9..f9fe555b8506 100644
>>>> >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
>>>> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
>>>> >> @@ -6,3 +6,14 @@ menuconfig PCIE_PWRSEQ
>>>> >> help
>>>> >> Say yes here to enable support for PCIe power sequencing
>>>> >> drivers.
>>>> >> +
>>>> >> +if PCIE_PWRSEQ
>>>> >> +
>>>> >> +config PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
>>>> >> + tristate "PCIe Power Sequencing driver for QCA6390"
>>>> >> + depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> >> + help
>>>> >> + Enable support for the PCIe power sequencing driver for the
>>>> >> + ath11k module of the QCA6390 WLAN/BT chip.
>>>> >> +
>>>> >> +endif
>>>> >
>>>> > As I mentioned in the 5/9 patch I'm concerned that the current
>>>> > definition of PCIE_PWRSEQ and PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390 will effectively hide
>>>> > the fact that QCA6390 may need additional configuration since the menu
>>>> > item will only show up if you have already enabled PCIE_PWRSEQ.
>>>> > Yes I see that these are set in the defconfig in 9/9 but I'm concerned
>>>> > about the more generic case.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm wondering if there should be a separate config QCA6390 within ath11k
>>>> > which would then select PCIE_PWRSEQ and PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
>>>>
>>>> Or is it possible to provide an optional dependency in Kconfig (I guess
>>>
>>> imply PCIE_PWRSEQ
>>> imply PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
>>> ?
>>
>> Nice, I had forgotten imply altogether. Would 'imply
>> PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390' in ath11k Kconfig be enough to address Jeff's
>> concern?
>
> Please don't use imply (ever), it doesn't normally do
> what you want. In this case, the only effect the
> 'imply' has is to change the default of the PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
> option when a defconfig contains QCA6390.
>
> If this is indeed what you want, it's still better to do the
> equivalent expression in PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390 rather than ATH11K:
>
> config PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
> tristate "PCIe Power Sequencing driver for QCA6390"
> default ATH11K && ARCH_QCOM
Sounds good to me but should it be 'default ATH11K_PCI && ARCH_QCOM'? My
understanding is that we don't need PWRSEQ for ATH11K_AHB devices.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists