[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <atbx7mspjbymkzgstk4l64qz3uky3wpmx4isrfg3ixgtvebdd2@cktpe4ejfk7k>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:58:40 -0600
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, <lucas.dimarchi@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] allmodconfig build error in next-20240108
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:15:23PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:57:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:33:36 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Recent -next trees get the following build error for allmodconfig builds:
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c: In function ‘xe_guc_pagefault_handler’:
>> > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: error: writing 16 bytes into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
>> > 57 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
>> > | ^
>> > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:644:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’
>> > 644 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
>> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:689:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’
>> > 689 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
>> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c:340:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’
>> > 340 | memcpy(pf_queue->data + pf_queue->tail, msg, len * sizeof(u32));
>> > | ^~~~~~
>> > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h:17,
>> > from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h:16,
>> > from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h:13,
>> > from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c:16:
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h:102:25: note: at offset [1144, 265324] into destination object ‘tile’ of size 8
>> > 102 | struct xe_tile *tile;
>> > |
>>
>> Which architecture? What compiler and version? Anything special in your build
>> setup? I do x86_64 allmodconfig builds all day with gcc v13.2 and I don't see
>> this failure.
>
>Good point!
>
>I am using gcc version 11.3.1 20230605 (Red Hat 11.4.1-2) on x86_64.
>I see the same behavior on gcc version 8.5.0, which for all I know might
>be too old.
I could reproduce it with allmodconfig and gcc 11.4.1 from rockylinux,
but not with gcc 9.3 or 12.3. Also it's not reproduced with gcc 11.4.1
when using defconfig + CONFIG_DRM_XE (even if -Wstringop-overflow is
still added).
I don't see a bug in the code, even if it inverts the head/tail
convention.
Searching around showed this which may be relevant: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854
At least I can reproduce the same issue as in the snippet provided
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854#c7) with the buggy
compiler.
So, maybe the best thing to do for now is to disable -Wstringop-overflow
for gcc < 12?
------8<-----
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
index 6952da8979ea..0433a3c6cbfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wunused-const-variable)
subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wpacked-not-aligned)
subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wformat-overflow)
subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wformat-truncation)
-subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-overflow)
+subdir-ccflags-$(call gcc-min-version, 120000) += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-overflow)
subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-truncation)
# The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra
ifeq ($(findstring 2, $(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN)),)
------8<-----
and if we are tweaking the warnings, then do similarly in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
so it doesn't show up again with W=1 builds. Thoughts?
Lucas De Marchi
>
> Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists