lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:11:46 -0500
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Rengarajan S <rengarajan.s@...rochip.com>, Kumaravel Thiagarajan
 <kumaravel.thiagarajan@...rochip.com>, Tharun Kumar P
 <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
 linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_pci1xxxx: off by one in
 pci1xxxx_process_read_data()

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:52:28 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:

> These > comparisons should be >= to prevent writing one element beyond
> the end of the rx_buff[] array.  The buffer has RX_BUF_SIZE[] elements.

Hi,
your commit title message is very confusing and doesn't hint that this
is a bug fix (or a potential bug fix)...

Hugo Villeneuve


> 
> Fixes: aba8290f368d ("8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add Burst mode reception support in uart driver for writing into FIFO")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> From static analysis, not testing.
> 
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> index 558c4c7f3104..cd258922bd78 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci1xxxx.c
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static void pci1xxxx_process_read_data(struct uart_port *port,
>  	 * to read, the data is received one byte at a time.
>  	 */
>  	while (valid_burst_count--) {
> -		if (*buff_index > (RX_BUF_SIZE - UART_BURST_SIZE))
> +		if (*buff_index >= (RX_BUF_SIZE - UART_BURST_SIZE))
>  			break;
>  		burst_buf = (u32 *)&rx_buff[*buff_index];
>  		*burst_buf = readl(port->membase + UART_RX_BURST_FIFO);
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void pci1xxxx_process_read_data(struct uart_port *port,
>  	}
>  
>  	while (*valid_byte_count) {
> -		if (*buff_index > RX_BUF_SIZE)
> +		if (*buff_index >= RX_BUF_SIZE)
>  			break;
>  		rx_buff[*buff_index] = readb(port->membase +
>  					     UART_RX_BYTE_FIFO);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ