linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_pci1xxxx: fix off by one in pci1xxxx_process_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:07:42 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Rengarajan S <rengarajan.s@...rochip.com>,
	Kumaravel Thiagarajan <kumaravel.thiagarajan@...rochip.com>,
	Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_pci1xxxx: fix off by one in
 pci1xxxx_process_read_data()

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:46:05PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> Hi,
> it is not simply a matter of adding "fix" to the title.
> 
> You must explain what and why vs. how.
> 
> Please see:
>   https://cbea.ms/git-commit/#why-not-how
> 
> for some guidelines on writing a good commit message.

Sorry, but no, Dan knows how to write a good commit message, this patch
is fine, I will take it as-is.  Please do not nit-pick stuff like this.

thanks,

greg k-h