lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppcsQtS7h4g+hK+sss7pDuvKjkJX1o7_DUO-rTg1BtWLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:50:37 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, 
	swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org, vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, 
	airlied@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, 
	quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, 
	quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, 
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/msms/dp: fixed link clock divider bits be over
 written in BPC unknown case

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 22:19, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Since the value of DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_8 is already left shifted, in the
> BPC unknown case, the additional shift causes spill over to the other
> bits of the [DP_CONFIGURATION_CTRL] register.
> Fix this by changing the return value of dp_link_get_test_bits_depth()
> in the BPC unknown case to (DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_8 >> DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_SHIFT).
>
> Fixes: c943b4948b58 ("drm/msm/dp: add displayPort driver support")
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>

For the patch itself:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

Additional note. Since this made me look at how DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH is
handled in the driver, I stumbled upon dp_link_bit_depth_to_bpc() vs
dp_link_bit_depth_to_bpp(). These two functions look pretty redundant.
Since the former one is used only for the debugfs, please consider
sending a patch that removes it for the sake of using the latter one
and /3 in dp_test_data_show().


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ